Thursday, February 24, 2011

Lainey- Boy Crazy

New from Lainey -

Boy Crazy

Everyone's expecting the next wave of straight up psycho to hit any time now, or at least just as soon as her current romance sours. Especially those who had experience with it last time, seeing as she keeps picking men who inevitably step out on her.


Her ex was cheating, and he wasn't careful about. Word got out to a magazine because the other girl talked. She of course lost her f-cking sh-t. Complete meltdown. Which is not unusual, no. But you don't let them see, right? You should never let them see.


What did she do?


Mega A list star calls up the editor. Of a tabloid. And wails her ass. WAILS. Screaming, cursing, threatening... and then this:


"I hope that bitch gets cancer. You can print that."
Embarrassing, right?


Amazingly, they spared her the humiliation and did not publish the quote. But the publicist owed some favours after that. And next time, with a new regime, she may not be so lucky.

Update: As of 3/16/11, Lainey has eliminated: Taylor Swift

Top suspect -

101 comments:

MM said...

Cameron Diaz?

Rita said...

MM - My first thought exactly! Remember when she gave shit to Justin T. after his cheating allegations?

Also, pleaaaase! A-Rod stinks of tacky player! The guy obviously already cheats left and right, from the start of his relationship with Cameron.

My second guess would also be related to Cameron Diaz: Jessica Biel!

talia said...

since lainey doesn't like her anymore and is talking about this one being a mega star, i can't think of anyone else being this than cam...!

sunnyside1213 said...

Gotta be Cam.

Lila said...

Why does this scream Halle to me, then? Rethinking...

harpo068 said...

MEGA star? Sounds like Julia Roberts to me. Sure, I guess Cammie is A list, but a mega star? Also, is she that wacko?

harpo068 said...

Halle is also a good guess, except that I thought her current bf was "just business" as she told Gabriel?

Lila said...

Wait a minute...
Nah. Angelina doesn't have a publicist....

Kate16 said...

It says current romance and last romance, so that rules out Jessica Biel (and possibly Angelina - it's been years since her last relationship).

My first thought was Cam. I can picture her going nuts.
Though what about Drew Barrymore? She has a new man. She doesn't come across as cussing though, more weird than psycho. Though there were some Justin Long cheating rumours back in 2008/9.
I can also picture Eva Longoria going nuts. But if you believe Ted's Chester Shorts-Off/Sercretia Ohio blind, there is no way she'd do it. Too much to lose.

Jacqueline said...

Totally Halle.

Especially the part about the next wave of crazy, and the picking bad men. That ex-husband of hers cheated on her like crazy, and we have witnessed was she is capable of.

All that stuff about Gabriel, the abuse, racism etc, cant you just see her calling in and saying all that!

And now, everything is back to normal? Till she cracks again!

petlewin said...

This is Hallie!! IMO

Ashlee said...

Halle is a good guess but I think the "But you don't let them see, right? You should never let them see." line rules her out. Halle's ugly custody fight with Gabriel has been very public -- TMZ/People/Radar have been all over each camp's attacks/rebuttals. Lainey's saying that this blind is about someone whose dirty laundry is more private, but threatening to come out. Cameron is a really good guess. Who was the "other woman" in the Justin/Cameron breakup again?

Stacey said...

My first thought reading it was Halle with Gabriel/Kim...but Cameron Diaz is a really great guess! Lainey has written about her freaking out at Justin publicly over their breakup and embarrassing herself. I'd say Halle or Cameron.

Stacey said...

Just did some googling. From Page Six in 2007:

"CAMERON Diaz is not over Justin Timberlake just yet, and things got heated when she saw her ex chatting up Jessica Biel in L.A. after the Golden Globes. Sources say the temperamental star "blew up" at Biel after she saw Timberlake flirting with her. Diaz followed Timberlake to the In Style party at the Hilton Oasis, where "they had an awkward conversation." The "Charlie's Angels" star then trailed Timberlake to the Beverly Hilton rooftop for the Universal party, where she found him chatting up Biel - and screamed at the "Illusionist" star. "If that's how she wants to get him back, it won't work," said our insider. "She's desperate." Reps for Diaz did not return our call."

So she definitely has problems keeping her jealousy in check. I think Halle may be a little more controlled than this.

Tephy said...

When I read the word "regime" I immediately thought of Gwyneth and her cray-cray exercise regime.

Maybe she's in the middle of a cleanse and was hongray, hence the outburst?

Mariangela said...

i think this is cam based in the following clues: first lainey's use of the term "wave" - isn't cameron diaz an avid surfer and is often photographed doing just that? then the "step out" term. isn't that a baseball term? like, stepping out of the batters box (READ a-rod?). then there is the "regime" reference - just a coupke of days ago lainey haf posted a couple of articles about cam's serious workout sessions, and how she is getting seriously buff. that for me says cameron's fitness regime. then the whole jt cheating freak out. this smells like cameron!!

Clancy said...

Great find Stacey, and can't you just hear Cameron's voice saying 'and you can print that!'

Doc Cowboy said...

In what universe is Cameron a mega A star?

Lila said...

In what universe is Cameron a mega A star?

Uh, this one. She's been one of the top five earning actresses for years now.

http://www.forbes.com/2010/08/02/sandra-bullock-reese-witherspoon-business-entertainment-highest-paid-actresses.html

Lila said...

If this is Cam, her "crazy" is new news to Lainey. She'd even recently forgot about the whole Justin Timberlake Golden Globes meltdown, portraying Cam as this uber-confident Kate Hudson manslinger type, which she's not.

Don't think Jessica Biel was the person Justin cheated with - wasn't it Scarlett?

I think this is more likely to be Halle.

MISCH said...

Even Kate Hudson isn't who Lainey thinks she is...she's needy also...

Lila said...

Good point MISCH. And, this could totally be Kate H.

hordac said...

It screams Cam to me. You have to remember, Lainey is more obvious than Ted with her blinds. And she's been less than thrilled with Cam for hanging all over a douche like A-Rod.

Caz1310 said...

To me Lainey is ambivalent about Cam. She loves her in the new Bad Teacher movie yet is exasperated at her for fawwning & following in A-Rod's footsteps. She wants the super confident ballsy Cam, not the weak subservient to her boyfriend Cam. Totally agree Hordac. I didn't make the Cam connection - good one guys. Lainey is very obvious in who she's current got in her sights.

Jamee said...

My first guess was Cam too, but this seems way more like Halle, only because there are no reports of cheating in any of Cam's previous relationships. Yet sooo many of Halle's there was cheating well reported (Derek Jeter, Eric Benet). And there are no "hints" about waves and regime and whatever. Lainey doesn't do that. She sticks to a story, and is nothing like Ted. You really can't read that far into Lainey blinds like you can with Ted, at least not as much.

Also, Cam and Justin were already broken up when the whole Biel thing happened at the Oscar party. It wasn't that long after they had announced their split, so that's why she freaked out. Typical for a girl to think a guy is still her property even after they're done and he's free to do whatever he wants. Either way, there was no cheating in that situation. It doesn't mean he didn't cheat on her, but the entire Page 6 story has nothing to do with cheating. And there weren't any stories about Justin cheating with Biel either. Don't you think the press would be all OVER that if there were?

Halle for the win...

crila16 said...

No...this isn't Cameron. Cameron is like the guy in the relationship. She doesn't whine, she never acts hurt...she just moves on as if she doesn't care.

This is definitely Halle Berry. Without a doubt. I'm sure it was her talking to the reporters about Kim Kardashian. Halle was P-off about it and did not hold back.

I said...

I don't know about Halle. Halle doesn't strike me as the type to go after women...she goes after the men. If she's upset about a woman her man is cheating with...she'll go straight to the man and rip him a new one - either verbally or through the press.

Seems more like Cam to me. Cam seem to be this no-holds-barred kind of girl who says it like she feels it all the time.

Samm said...

I`m thinking this could possibly be Demi Moore. Do you remember just recently that girl who said Ashton cheated on Demi with her did all those interviews. Just a thought :)

I said...

Or what about Miss Britney Spears?

- next wave of straight up psycho

- current romance (that manager of hers)

- men who step out on her (KFed)

- complete meltdown when KFed cheated

- Britney has called up tabloids before and I can see Britney saying something like that and I can also see the tabloid not printing it b/c they feel sorry for her.

- And for some reason...new regime seems to fit Britney...don't know why.

duffgrl said...

Not sure for this one...although I agree w/ Caz that Lainey has been ambivalent re: Cam.

Guesswho said...

The obvious answer is Halle. Everyone knows she is nucking futs. Total headcase. I don't see Cam for this. She seems too cool for this.

Unless Lainey was going for someone less obvious, in which case I have no idea.

Caz1310 said...

Appreciate the Halle angle. I don't see Lainey doing a her as blind item on her because her stoush with Gabriel is all over the mags in detail. Don't think she's important enough to do a blind article on or that there'd be anything interesting enough that's hidden. Could be wrong though. There's some fab goss still doing the rounds that Sandra has a Nazi sextape with Jesse and that she's not dobbing on him because he's got the goods on her.

I said...

@Caz: Are you kidding me with the Sandy sex tape? I have ALWAYS thought Sandy is way way too good to be true. Always thought there was spin involved in her image.

Also, NOBODY marries someone like JJ, at her age, without knowing his Nazi tendencies. Sandy's on record as saying she loves his "perfect Aryan children" (yes, she used the word Aryan).

Also, Sandy had her adopted black baby boy circumcised by a MOHEL...not just a typical hospital circumcision. No, Sandy specifically used a Jewish holy man to snip her son's tip. Why? Neither Sandy nor her son are Jewish. I just found that super strange.

Would not be surprised that said tape exists.

Still can't understand how in HECK Sandy managed to come out smelling like a rose in that JJ debacle.

Megan said...

To me, this is someone who a magazine had an article coming directly from the girl he cheated with (i.e. Ashton, Tiger, Jesse James). With Cameron and Halle I can't recall a story like that. Also, I don't think this is Cam because she and Arod are still/back together.

Caz1310 said...

@I of course it could be a crazy rumour about Sandra (especially the Nazi bit)...however it's bizarre that she didn't say anything at all about JJ when the drama broke. There's nothing on record of her bad mouthing him. I think she knew about him, gave the performance of her life at the Oscars and has totally stage managed things since. The timing of adopting a baby is extraordinary and just could be a fluke. She has totally set herself up as America's sweetheart - if her image is tarnished in any way she's cactus. JJ has something on her or she's paid him off? I like her, just pointing out Hollywood PR #101.

I said...

@Caz: Now that you mention it, how perfect was her Oscar speech? At the time, I genuinely thought she loved & adored him, but you may be right that she gave the performance of her life. Knowing it must make JJ feel like a complete tool hearing her gush about him AND it would make everyone feel all the more sorry for her being blindsided and all.

Camille Grammer did a similar thing during Kelsey's award toast when she said what a perfect marriage they had and how many years they spent together. She later said she knew at the time she made the speech that he was leaving her.

God, this makes me so sad. I was giving Sandy the benefit of the doubt about adopting that black baby and just found it strange that she had a Mohel do the circumcision. Now, if she specifically adopted her son to dispel rumors about her being racist...and she knew about JJ a LONG time ago and her adoption was all a setup...it just makes me feel horrible for that poor little child.

If it's true, hope Sandy grows to love that little boy regardless.

I said...

@Caz: Also, Ian Halperin apparently has some dirt on Sandy that he's been sitting on for awhile. And I've always wondered why.

IF the Nazi rumors are true about Sandy (and any of them...sex tape or not...just the fact that she knew about JJ and condoned it), then she must be in REAL TIGHT in the Hollywood circles b/c I can tell you that Jews do NOT take that kind of thing lightly. Saying things like "the best accountants are Jewish or Hollywood is run by Jews" or whatever other stereotype is one thing and a lot of Jews let that ride but the Nazi thing is just horrific to Jews (as well as blacks, disabled peoples, homosexuals and to anyone who has had relatives in the camps).

So it's really surprising she hasn't experienced any Hollywood backlash over it (like, say... Mel Gibson has) and the interesting thing to me is WHY.

Which is why I have reasonable doubt whether Sandy, in fact, knew anything about it. I mean, she can't be more powerful than Mel Gibson, right?

So maybe Sandy really is Miss American Pie...although part of me just really doubts that.

Arrgh!!! This is driving me cuckoo. I would so like to know but everyone is silent on this (including Ted). Maybe the truth will come out eventually. Which would be huge.

But...is Sandy involved in a relationship right now as per this Lainey blind?

Sorry for the long post!!

I said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Caz1310 said...

Hi all - I'm not saying that Sandy adopted a baby to put her in a better light! Not doubting her intentions at all. It turned out to be perfect PR timing because the articles at the time totally focussed on her bringing home a new baby. Certainly other celebs do have babies to improve their image (Rebecca Grayheart & Eric Dane, for example).

Clancy said...

Megan, I think this blind goes back and forward in time so it's not about Cam's (or whoever it is) romance. They're waiting for something to happen with this actress ('the next wave of straight-up psycho') because of what happened last time when she called the editor. So there are no cheating allegations yet; they're just waiting for her to lose her shit when it, inevitably, occurs again.

MinnesotaNice said...

First time poster. I love this site!

I think this is Cameron Diaz; didn't she talk to USWeekly at some point before she and JT split up, saying they were good and that comments otherwise were BS? I seem to remember that the interview was rather emotionally charged and that it was Diaz who approached the magazine.

Also, Janice Min was the Editor at USWeekly then; she has moved on to the Hollywood Reporter, hence the hint about a "new regime" towards the end of the blind.

HKCCRCLC said...

Love this site and read it constantly. This is the first time I've contributed. I thought this was for comments about Lainey's post. Suddenly we're speculating about a Sandra Bullock sex tape? First, it's well known that she and Jesse adopted this child before their marriage blew up. I've seen nothing to indicate that this child is window-dressing. Second, many non-Jews choose to hire a mohel to circumcise their sons -- because doctors use a clamp and until recently used NO ANESTHETIC, and mohels do it freehand, ie more accurately, and have always given the baby a cloth to suck on with a few drops of wine. Why is it not possible that Sandra Bullock foolishly married a jerk and ignored all her friends' warnings, then found out in the most hideous way possible, and is choosing to take the high road? I think @caz's comment contains undertones of racism and should be removed.

lio-evilo said...

Interesing,Cameron Diaz was just on Jimmy Kimmel and had only good things to say about Justin...

The "But you don't let them see, right? You should never let them see." part screams Gwyneth to me,Lainey always says GP's obsessed with keeping up appearances,like during that Bosowrth-Martin thing

http://www.laineygossip.com/Star_Magazine_reports_that_Chris_Martin_cheats_on_Gwyneth_Paltrow_with_Kate_Bosworth.aspx

http://www.laineygossip.com/Chris_Martin_with_Coldplay_South_American_tour_after_spending_week_with_Gwyneth_Paltrow_in_Nashville.aspx

but I can't say I've heard of any cheating ex of GP...

HKCCRCLC said...

Oh, and by the way, that comment Sandy made about having "Aryan children" -- it's in this article, and very clearly a joke, in reference to her being a brunette and the kids all being beautiful blondes that she claimed and loved as hers: http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20061646,00.html

I said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
I said...

@HKCCRCLC: I feel the need to correct you. I have never heard of "many non-Jews" using a Mohel to circumcise their sons. Non-Jews have it done at a hospital (as there is ample research showing that circumcision lowers the risk of infection & STDs). In fact, many non-practicing Jews forgo the Mohel and do it at a hospital as well as many consider the hospital environment to be more sanitary.

Second, although Sandy & Jesse did ostensibly commence adoption proceedings before their marriage imploded, they did not at all "adopt this child before their marriage blew up". That is false.

Third, sadly...many do believe this child is "window-dressing" as you put it.

Oh, and by the way, that comment Sandy made about having "Aryan children" - I read the article. It's quite obvious it was meant as a "joke". I just don't think it's funny. Especially coming from a German woman who lived in Nuremberg and whose maternal grandfather was a scientist in Nuremberg. Completely inappropriate and unfunny. JMO.

And speaking of JMO: what I love about this site and North America...is that everyone is allowed to have an opinion. There is my opinion, there is your opinion, and there is Caz' opinion. And all three are allowed to coexist.

But, welcome HKCCRCLC. I see you just joined Blogger this month. I'm sure Sandy appreciates that you have her back.

HKCCRCLC said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
I said...

@HKCCRCLC:

I feel the need to correct you. "many non-Jews" do NOT, in fact, hire a Mohel to circumcise their little boys. Circumcisions are usually done in hospital for non-Jews and, also, for many non-practicing Jews as well. Hospitals are simply seen as a more sanitary environment.

Second, Jesse & Sandy did NOT adopt Louis before their marriage imploded. They had ostensibly begun initial adoption proceedings while still married but did NOT adopt before their marriage "blew up". So that is false. (Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but there really is no confirmation on the initial adoption proceedings either)

Also, there are a lot of people who believe that little Louis is "window-dressing" as you put it. I have seen it all over the internet on blogs & the like but never in a tabloid.

Oh, and by the way, that comment Sandy made about having "Aryan children" -- I know it's in that article. I read that article. I understand it was meant as a "joke". I just don't think it's funny. Especially coming from a German woman who lived in Nuremberg and whose maternal grandfather was a scientist in Nuremberg. Just. Not. Funny. At all.

But the above is JMO, of course. Just like your opinion is your opinion and Caz' opinion is her/his opinion. And all three are allowed to coexist, right? I hope so, since that is precisely what I love about North America.

But HKCCRCLC - welcome. I notice you just joined Blogger in Feb. Sandy should be really happy you have her back. And just an FYI...I may be wrong, but I believe Sandy was initially introduced into this thread b/c she was believed to be the subject of this thread.

Tara said...

I have to step in because obviously Caz has not seen this, but I refuse to believe that the comments were meant as racist WHATSOEVER, that is absolutely ridiculous @HKCCRCLC--and I am sensitive to that kind of BS. No way no how never never never has Caz ever had anything less than a respectful tone and I for one will not stand for that kind of insinuation against someone who hasn't a racist undertone OR overtone.

I for one like Sandy quite a bit, but it would not be the first time someone did something outrageous for PR if it were her MO (see: BRANGELINA). I don't think she did, but the timing sure was perfect, as Caz stated. Green, white, black, purple--would still be great timing regardless.

HKCCRCLC said...

OK, so it's not even a teeny bit racist to speculate that Sandy had her adopted black baby boy circumcised by a mohel (a rabbi who is also an MD), in a conversation about whether Sandy is married to a cheater. And it's not insulting to imply that those who choose to circumcise in their homes (i.e., the majority of Jews around the world) are selecting an unsanitary environment for their newborns. Plus, the last time I checked in Wikipedia, Sandy was American, not German. I don't think her remarks were funny, either, but that's irrelevant to this conversation. Folks, spare me your definitions of what remarks are racist and not. Blind Items Exposed, I'd ask that you remove this entire conversation from the site.

I said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
I said...

@HKCCRCLC......huh?

WRONG #1: A Mohel is NOT a Rabbi who is also an MD. A Mohel is someone who is trained and certified to perform brit milah (a bris). He/she does not necessarily have to be either a Rabbi or an MD. Now, a Mohel COULD be an MD and a Mohel COULD be a Rabbi...and I SUPPOSE a Mohel COULD also be both a Rabbi & an MD but that is definitely NOT a requirement. From where are you getting your information?

WRONG #2: The "majority of Jews around the world" do NOT necessarily choose to circumcise in their homes. Where do you get this information? Have you taken a world poll of Jews around the world?

WRONG #3: There has been one very high profile case of a Mohel accidentally passing on Herpes to several newborn boys. Gross, but true. So, yes, sterility and sanitation are a concern.

WRONG #4: Are you citing Wikipedia as your only source? Anyone can edit a Wiki page. Not to mention that Wiki mentions nothing about Sandy NOT being German. I can tell you that other sources clearly mention that (i) Sandy identifies as German and (ii) Sandy either has German citizenship or is working towards getting it. Sandy is also fluent in German. I don't know why you are trying to distance Sandy from her Germanic roots, b/c she is a proud German. Attending awards ceremonies in Germany, etc.

I said...

@HKCCRCLC: Why are you so afraid of this conversation about Sandy being on the site?

I said...

Clarification: I believe Sandy identifies as both German & American....is what I meant to say. Sorry. Just completely in awe of all the incorrect information.

Kelly said...

Having lived in Arlington, VA, where Sandra Bullock is from, I can say that I don't see this being her. I'm not saying that I know Sandra, however, people from this area know her well and the general concensus is that she is nothing but wonderful. Racism accusations aside, she seems far too poised and controlled to lose it like the person in this blind.

Btw, I didn't sense any racism in Caz's post, nor have I ever seen any hint of such a thing in any of Caz's previous posts.

I'm thinking that Halle is the right person here. She just has a slightly unhinged vibe. I've always thought that about her.

-KADixonLaw

Tara said...

@HKCCRCLC I believe you are referring to posts by @I, not Caz. I is the one who makes reference to "black baby" a couple times and speaks of the Mohel above. I could not find anything out of sorts with Caz's comment and was confused with your accusation earlier. I believe @I is Jewish (correct me if I am wrong, I) and that would be where concern about Sandy using a Mohel for Louis comes in--Sandy, Jesse and baby are reportedly all not Jewish. Caz never made any mention of any of these points, and has never said anything out of line.

KADix, well said. I am on the Halle train too.

Caz1310 said...

Good golly...my jaw dropped when I checked back in on this blog. To the person with the name in caps...I suggest you read comments more closely because you'll see that there's nothing racist in any of my nor @I's comments. Thank you to all who have also come to the same conclusion and have defended me. Sandy, whilst not the most popular choice, could be a very long shot on this one. The mags certainly protect her.

HKCCRCLC said...

Mea culpa. I didn't interview every Jew and Mohel in the world, only those in my extended family here and in Israel. I'm sure there are Mohels who aren't MDs, Mohels who screw up, etc. Also, good to know Sandra is proud of her heritage; I'm not always keen on her sense of humour, and I don't know the exact date she adopted her baby.

My point in the first place is that discussion on Mohels, circumcision, sanitation, nationality, whether a baby is black, etc. is irrelevant to a debate on who's with a cheater and likely to blow up again.

So back to that. Lainey is a huge fan of Sandra's; she's often written about how classy she thinks Sandra has been in the aftermathand, plus she's a hater of Jesse: http://www.laineygossip.com/Jesse_James_to_write_tellall_book_about_Sandra_Bullock_21feb11.aspx?CatID=0&CelID=0. So I don't think it's her.

Lainey has said that Halle's current squeeze, Oliver Martinez, is a dawg who steps out on his women. But Lainey was a fan of Gabriel Aubrey until that relationship ended (though she spoke out against the tactics both were using for awhile in their custody battle). Don't recall Aubrey's main crime as cheating, I think he took up with that Karvakian woman after his marriage ended, but who knows? Halle's last husband Eric what's-his-name was a cheater, but I thought the biggest problem with her first husband was that he was violent and beat her. There seems to be a pattern -- she chooses men who are bad for her -- but her track record doesn't seem to fit this blind.

I'm with team Cameron Diaz, for all of the reasons above, unless someone else emerges from the discussion.

HKCCRCLC said...

OK, I admit it. I didn't interview every Jew and Mohel in the world so I can't vouch for them all -- only the few hundred that are in my extended family here and in Israel. So far as I know, none of their dicks have fallen off. I apologize to Caz, who did not make the offending remarks, it was "I" who said, "Sandy had her adopted black baby boy circumcised by a MOHEL...not just a typical hospital circumcision. No, Sandy specifically used a Jewish holy man to snip her son's tip. Why? Neither Sandy nor her son are Jewish. I just found that super strange."

Maybe it is strange. My point in all of this is that Mohels, circumcision, Sandy's nationality and the colour of her baby are irrelevant and inflammatory in a discussion of whether she's the one who blows up whenever one of her cheating partners dumps her.

I'm not on Team Sandy, I'm not on Team Anybody. I read and enjoy this column because gossip is fun. I think the arguments in favour of Cam rule. So that's it from me, folks.

Jamee said...

Whoa. This is kind of insane. Accusing someone of being racist is a huge stand to take. I think what HKCCRCLC is missing is that "I" brought up the Mohel because Sandra was married to a man who has been accused many times of being anti-Semitic, proof with the many photos that came out of him saluting like Hitler in a Nazi cap, etc. His defense is that he likes history and is fascinated by the Nazis/WWII Germany. You can believe him or not, but either way, Sandra WAS associated with a man who is supposedly anti-Semitic and might have known about it. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I, isn't that why you brought up the fact that you thought her hiring a mohel was "super strange"? (Sorry, but I don't know any non-Jewish/non-practicing Jews who hired a mohel to circumcise their son. Is a bris not a Jewish ceremony? It's like a Catholic having a Bar Mitzvah, no?) Basically you were saying that you think Sandra must have known about his ways (racism) so she wants to further herself from him by performing a Jewish ceremony, therefore showing that she's not anti-Semitic. That is, IF her adoption was to soften her image of the recent blow up. Do I have that correct, I? So HKCCRCLC, no one jumped to any conclusions about this, she's just trying to fit the pieces together, wondering if Sandra has dirty secrets/is not the all American apple pie that some may think/might be the topic of a/this blind. Yes, the conversation has sort of gone off course, but sometimes that happens.

Second, yeah, Sandra Bullock is American, but she's German-American. Regardless of how either I or HKCCRCLC want to look at it, she is.

And now my opinion. Per TMZ, Sandra and Jesse DID have the baby before the breakup/scandal blew. http://www.tmz.com/2010/05/14/sandra-bullock-jesse-james-baby-louis-bardo-people-magazine-photoshoot/

As far as timing goes, with the above link and the fact that I read many, many times that "Bombshell" McGee chose to release the scandal because Sandra was at the top of her game, just won an Oscar, and it would be HUGE news. McGee knew that everyone would be talking about her (wanted the publicity AND the money for selling the info to the tabloid), so it would be a perfect time for her drop that bomb. I think she had control over the timing of the scandal, and I think the baby adoption was a coincidence.

I have no idea if Sandra knew about Jesse anti-Semitism, BUT this is the blind Caz was talking about with the sex tape. (I capitalized the "racist symbol" part, which I believe is a huge clue that this could be Sandra/Jesse James. I'm not saying it is, just saying she is a guess. So HKCCRCLC, do you see how this is all related?

"It was big news when this couple broke up, and now you’re going to hear some of the grossest behind-the-scenes details.

There are photos. And a video. In them, the couple is engaged in various sex acts and using lots of filthy language. Since they were married at the time, no big deal, right? Well, the man is wearing leather, a brown cap with a racist symbol, and a gun. He also has a little mustache as the result of a scatalogical act in which the couple engages on the video.

When they broke up, he went to rehab, but curiously left after only a short period of time. Why? So that he could secure the tape. She was also extremely worried about the tape, as its publication would have certainly caused her pristine reputation to come crashing down. Her handlers rushed to the home, couldn’t find the tape, but were able to secure some revealing photos.

So, in case you are wondering why she was so quiet after the breakup, it is because she is still vulnerable to being as condemned as he is. He still has the tape, she still has the photos, and the two will be eternally locked in a Mexican-style standoff."

Caz1310 said...

Thanks for the apology. No offence taken.

Tara said...

Props, HK for apologizing. Once you explained your POV above, it's much more understandable in context.

I still think Halle or Cam have stronger arguments for this, however just remembered that in The Blind Side, the "never let them see" is a big thing with Sandy's character and I do believe it is a line from the movie. But I haven't heard of her dating anyone (other than the way overplayed Ryan Reynolds rumor).

Viking Girl said...

HKCCRCLC - I've read this thread through three times to check, and I have yet to see anything remotely resembling racism. So you don't agree with someones opinion/speculation, that's fine. But please don't go throwing the 'racism' card around. If nothing else, it's boring.

I said...

@ HKCCRCLC: I was responding to the “Sandra has a Nazi sextape with Jesse” gossip comment. In responding to that comment, I brought up some facts that could bolster that gossip (which is what people do when discussing gossip). Such as Sandy’s nationality (fact), information about Mohels & circumcision (fact), and Sandy’s adoption (fact).

I brought up those facts because they are relevant to bolstering that gossip – again, which is what people do when discussing gossip. The facts that I brought up are neither irrelevant nor inflammatory because they are facts. How can facts be inflammatory? Facts are truth and truth exists – truth is not inflammatory.

You are offended by this factual comment of mine: "Sandy had her adopted black baby boy circumcised by a MOHEL...not just a typical hospital circumcision. No, Sandy specifically used a Jewish holy man to snip her son's tip. Why? Neither Sandy nor her son are Jewish. I just found that super strange."

My comment is the truth and can easily be checked via multiple sources to be true. I don’t need to pass off my comment as fact by saying that I have a “few hundred (Jews & Mohels) that are in my extended family here and in Israel”. (That kind of argument stopped working in High School, if it ever worked at all.)

Here’s another fact: to become a Rabbi takes YEARS of education. To become an MD also takes YEARS of education. I have never heard of people who would combine all these years of education to become BOTH a Rabbi AND a Mohel just so they can…what?.... circumcise little boys? LOL.

The truth is you do not need to be an MD to be a Mohel. You do not need to be a Rabbi to be a Mohel. You just need to take some courses to be a Mohel. Similarly to how you do not need to be an MD to be a midwife. You just need to take some courses to be a midwife.

Are you really trying to say that a simple snip is more complicated than delivering a baby such that it requires not only a medical degree but a rabbinical degree as well? That is laughable. But I guess all the “Jews and Mohels” in the “few hundred that are in (your) extended family here and in Israel” would disagree. SMH.

And finally, there is a whole other thread here discussing Tom Cruise and whether he is involved in pedophilia and/or child slavery among other things.

But I guess that discussion pales in comparison to the inflammatory racism of how strange I find it that a non-Jewish woman had her non-Jewish son circumcised by a Jewish holy man immediately following a disgusting Nazi-filled scandal involving her non-Jewish husband at the time.

Peace.

I said...

@ HKCCRCLC: I was responding to the “Sandra has a Nazi sextape with Jesse” gossip comment. In responding to that comment, I brought up some facts that are relevant to that gossip. Such as Sandy’s nationality (fact), information about Mohels & circumcision (fact), and Sandy’s adoption (fact).

I brought up those facts because they are relevant to perhaps bolstering that gossip – which is what people do when discussing gossip.

The facts that I brought up are neither irrelevant nor inflammatory because they are facts. How can facts be inflammatory? Facts are truth and truth exists – truth is not inflammatory.

You are offended by this comment of mine: "Sandy had her adopted black baby boy circumcised by a MOHEL...not just a typical hospital circumcision. No, Sandy specifically used a Jewish holy man to snip her son's tip. Why? Neither Sandy nor her son are Jewish. I just found that super strange."

My comment is the truth and can easily be checked via multiple sources to be true. Which is why I don’t need to pass off my comment as fact by saying that I have a “few hundred (Jews & Mohels) that are in my extended family here and in Israel”. (That kind of argument stopped working in High School, if it ever worked at all.)

Here’s another fact: to become a Rabbi takes YEARS of education. To become an MD also takes YEARS of education. I have never heard of people who would combine all these years of education to become BOTH a Rabbi AND an MD just so they can…what?.... circumcise little boys? LOL.

The truth is you do not need to be an MD to be a Mohel. You do not need to be a Rabbi to be a Mohel. You just need to take some courses to be a Mohel. Similarly to how you do not need to be an MD to be a midwife. You just need to take some courses to be a midwife.

Are you really trying to say that a simple snip is more complicated than delivering a baby such that it requires not only a medical degree but a rabbinical degree as well? That is laughable. But I guess all the “Jews and Mohels” in the “few hundred that are in (your) extended family here and in Israel” would disagree. SMH.

I said...

Thank you Viking Girl and Caz. I don't think my opinion/speculation is racist either.

I'm trying to get my head around the having a “few hundred that are in my extended family here and in Israel” comment as validation of conjecture. I thought that type of argument stopped working in High School. SMH.

talia said...

and now: please back to the topic!
i don't want to see everyone trying to have the last word in the debate and so continuing it...
nuff said

a37b7aea-45cc-11e0-8560-000bcdcb5194 said...

Halle Berry fo sho!

crila16 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
crila16 said...

HKCCRCLC - Sandra Bullock is actually 1/2 jewish. Her mother is Jewish and from Germany. I'm sure she's carried some of her mother's traditions with her through life, which is why she considers herself German and American at the same time.

Sex tape or no sex tape she's a very lovely woman. She also donated $1 million to New Orleans and another $1 million to Haiti after the quake. She adopted Louis, because he was from New Orleans and homeless/parentless. She figured she'd adopt an orphan in the U.S. as opposed to going to another country to adopt like Madonna and Angie. THere are a lot of homeless and parentless children in this country too.

HKCCRCLC said...

Interesting info, Crila16.

No way is this blind about Sandy. Lainey is a longtime Sandra Bullock fan and has gone on record as saying the woman had the class to NOT diss her ex in public. That's the opposite of going ballistic. I can't see Halle for this either. Custody battle notwithstanding, Halle has talked about her poor choice in men but doesn't seem to go for blaming women. Cameron seems to have the history of cheaters and I can imagine her with the temper too. IMHO.

Mariangela said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
I said...

LOL. I'm sorry but Sandy being 1/2 Jewish is NOT FACTUAL AT ALL. Where do you get this information?

In fact, many, many people think Sandy's adoption of a black baby and subsequent religious circumcision of said baby is damage control. But many journalists were prohibited from asking the tough questions.

Here is a great little opinion piece that discusses the issue and, actually, brings up the same exact non-racist point I brought up:
http://www.thejewishweek.com/blogs/adam_dickters_continuum/sandra_bullock_jewish_baby_mama

Here's a quote from the above piece: Maybe the 2010 version of "some of my best friends are Jewish" is "my baby is Jewish."...Shades of “few hundred (Jews) that are in my extended family here and in Israel”, n'est-ce pas?. Right.

Actually, I would happily leave this subject alone but, as a Jew, I cannot idly sit by while such blatant misinformation is propagated.

I said...

Sandra Bullock is NOT 1/2 Jewish. Where do you get this information?

I mean, it is such obvious damage control and not based in fact.

Here is an interesting opinion piece about Sandy Bullock which discusses the whole situation in a logical and factual way: http://www.thejewishweek.com/blogs/adam_dickters_continuum/sandra_bullock_jewish_baby_mama

blurry vice said...

I am just now reading this thread. I don't feel the need to delete any posts at this time. I don't feel anything anti-Semitic was said. Caz was just sharing a rumor she heard. Thank you for respecting each other here on this site.

crila16 said...

Sandra Bullock IS 1/2 Jewish. She may not be a practicingh Jew, but she is 1/2 Jewish. Her mother is. Look up your facts before spouting BS.

I said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
I said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
I said...

@crila16: It is you who need to check your facts.

It is NOT A FACT that Sandra Bullock is 1/2 Jewish.

It is NOT A FACT that Sandra Bullock's mother is Jewish.

It is NOT A FACT that ANYONE in Sandra Bullock's family is Jewish.

http://www.thejewishweek.com/blogs/adam_dickters_continuum/sandra_bullock_jewish_baby_mama

Personally, I would love to drop this topic. But, I simply cannot sit idly by and allow this type of misinformation to be propagated.

Why? The easiest way to dispel allegations of racism is by saying "All my friends are Jewish" or "I am 1/2 Jewish" or "My baby is Jewish". Please. It is such obvious damage control.

I said...

Addendum: Sorry I had to delete my prior two comments, but I was rephrasing my comment such that it would not be misconstrued.

This is one of the best FACTUAL discussion that I have found on the topic above if anyone is interested:

http://www.thejewishweek.com/blogs/adam_dickters_continuum/sandra_bullock_jewish_baby_mama

HKCCRCLC said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
HKCCRCLC said...

"I", unless you've personally seen Sandra Bullock's mother's birth certificate or are in her personal circle of close friends, you don't know her religion. The Internet has theories on both sides of this subject.

As for that so-called objective article -- it is mean-spirited, misleading and dances around the question of Sandra's ancestry in order to imply that lots of people in Hollywood, probably including Sandra, attach themselves to Judaism as a PR move – to improve their image.

"I", evidently you agree with those who think that Sandra adopted this child as "damage control." You're entitled to your opinion, of course. You've got lots of company. The People magazine article that covered the adoption had pages and pages of comments, mostly from people who think Sandra Bulloch adopted a black baby and circumcised him to improve her image after everyone found out Jesse James was a Nazi-loving, unfaithful jerk.

I disagree.

From what I understand, Sandra Bullock volunteered in New Orleans after Katerina for years. She started the adoption procedure four years ago, out of the limelight. She chose to adopt a baby from that community out of love for that community – she didn't care about the colour. She opted for circumcision, and went with a bris at home with a Mohel because she didn't want to go to the hospital (a Mohel will do the procedure safely at home).

I’m not entirely free of cynicism. Was it PR to release the story when and how it was released? Probably. But I just can't imagine someone adopting a baby and committing to any aspect of life with that baby as a PR stunt. It's just too hard and too much work. Everyone in this story agrees that she was a great parent to Jesse's kids -- she knows what's involved in parenting.

In this case, I'm buying what she's selling.

I said...

@HKCCRCLC : I reposted twice to try and be clear but unfortunately there are still misunderstandings. So let me try to clarify:

1) I posted that Sandra and/or anyone in her immediate family being Jewish is NOT A FACT....specifically because it is not known to be a fact. Perhaps I should have phrased it the following way:

There is no proof whatsoever and no reason at all to believe that Sandy Bullock, her mother, or anyone in her immediate family is Jewish. So it is beyond me how anyone can adamantly state that Sandy Bullock is Jewish. Further, I do support the argument presented in the article that Sandy Bullock's mother is NOT Jewish.

2) As for the article itself...nowhere did I call the article "objective". On the contrary, I referred to it as an "opinion piece" and a "FACTUAL discussion". An opinion meaning it is someone's personal view - a personal view not a hard fact. A factual discussion meaning the opinion is presented and discussed using ONLY FACTS. I don't find it misleading or mean-spirited (or racist) at all. It dances around nothing. It presents one person's opinion...an opinion that I happen to agree with which is why I posted it. The author expressed himself on the subject much better than I ever could.

The article is from www.thejewishweek.com. It is a website that aims to "connect the world to Jewish News, Culture, and OPINIONS". It is not a website that serves as PR for Hollywood stars.

4) You say that you "just can't imagine someone adopting a baby and committing to any aspect of life with that baby as a PR stunt." I say...what about Nicole Kidman and Tom Cruise's kids from their first marriage? Kids Nicole Kidman is rumored to not really care all that much about. There are many other examples of fake Hollywood families. For e.g., Travolta/Preston immediately comes to mind.

3) Finally, Sandy Bullock does seem like the sweetest person. However, many sweet people have dirty little secrets. Isn't that why we all are so fascinated by gossip?

You say you "buy what Sandy's selling". I'm saying...why does Sandy have to "sell" anything?

Our opinions differ. So be it. Nothing misleading and/or mean-spirited and/or racist about that.

Louise Armstrong said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Chelsea said...

Lainey basically revealed this to be Taylor swift today but I'm not sure about the cheating ex. John Mayer seemed to be just a fling and I had assumed that Jake and Taylor L. were just publicity relationships.

Joanne said...

Taylor Swift - Joe Jonas was the ex and Camilla Belle was the girl she wished would get cancer.

IMO

Jamee said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
GiGi said...

Lainey just revealed this in a post about Taylor Swift (http://www.laineygossip.com/Taylor_Swift_has_a_lot_of_baggage_heading_to_Milan_from_Venice_15mar11.aspx?CatID=0&CelID=0) - she finishes the post with:

"Not much time for any dating shenanigans, you would think, although this one is boy crazy – she’ll find it somewhere."

Chelsea said...

Okay, today Lainey confirmed that Taylor Swift is boy crazy but NOT the subject of the boy crazy blind vice. It's unlike Lainey to give such a blatant reveal and then take it back but there it is.

weiskotten said...

Taylor Swift = knotted

weiskotten said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
A Spoonful of Crazy! -Mona Blanche said...

I think this is about Cameron Diaz. See the title of this post: http://www.laineygossip.com/Cameron_Diaz_in_Europe_while_ARod_flirts_with_housewife_in_Miami_07dec10.aspx?CatID=1078&CelID=0

Justin cheated and Cameron flipped. We know that. Lainey regularly points out that A-Rod is a douche.

hoopitup4adalla said...

Halle Berry

Jennifer said...

Lainey totally outted this as Cam today

Natalie said...

Lainey wrote this in a post about Cameron Diaz today:
"What’s more likely is that in that time he’ll f-ck her over. You know, ARod is just that kind of guy. And then she won’t believe it and she’ll drill a hole through some editor’s ass when a magazine prints the story. What?"
Seems this blind item has been revealed.

Sarah said...

Yup, agreed. I think Lainey just revealed Cam as this blind today as well.

Jamee said...

Whoo finally a reveal from Lainey! Doesn't get more blatant than that. Solved.

GiGi said...

TOTALLY revealed by Lainey today: http://www.laineygossip.com/Alex_Rodriguez_rumoured_flirting_with_Christie_Brinkley_behind_Cameron_Diazs_back_06jul11.aspx?CatID=0&CelID=0.

As she says in the post, right after revealing: "Gift!"

Total gift from Lainey today. Here's the exact wording of the reveal for those who don't want to bother reading the post. It's a post about Cameron Diaz and how she was jealous of Jessica Biel when Justin Timberlake first showed up whit her after him and Cam broke up.

"She also goes apesh-t over it, as demonstrated in the incident over Biel and, well, in how she has behaved with magazine editors when they suggest her boyfriends may not be faithful. Gift!"

Kirby said...

Confirmed: Cameron Diaz.

ortigasclover said...

This is really a great read for me. Thank you for publishing articles having a great insight stimulates me to check more often for new write ups. Keep posting!

Clover
www.n8fan.net

riveraaissa said...

Nice post. Thank you for taking the time to publish this information very informative; so happy to be given a privilege to post a comment here.

aissa
www.joeydavila.net

ad