Friday, January 14, 2011

Blind Vice: Who Wants to Trade Sex for Shoes?

New from Ted today -



Blind Vice: Who Wants to Trade Sex for Shoes?

We've always had a girl-crush on Carmelita Salami-Climber. She's très likable.
Kim Kardashian: Fit In Your Jeans by Friday: Amazing Abs Body SculptHell, this reality starlet has won America over, and it doesn't look like she'll be dancing out of the spotlight anytime soon.
But we just learned the funniest story about Carmelita, while she was trying to make the jump from being just famous to über-famous: See, Miz Climber has been in the Hollywood scene for many years and has never been strapped for cash.
What's a hottie to do when she wants a pair of shoes that even the most A-list of celebs are on the waiting list for?
Screw the guy who is the celebrity endorser for the company, natch!
At a house party a while back, Salami-Climber ran into the dark and handsome dude who, at the time, was working with the brand that had the goods Carm was lusting after.
And the conversation went a little something like this:
"I'm dying to get those new shoes. How do I get off the wait list?" Salami-Climber asked, batting those pretty eyelashes of hers.
"If you f—k me I'll make it happen," laughed celeb. X.
"OK."
The good-looking duo (who are still pals, for what it's worth) proceeded to go upstairs at the house party and do it in the shower. We need to turn on the cold water just hearing about this one!
More than a few partygoers witnessed this wet ‘n' wild encounter go down—literally. The glittery folks in attendance followed right along to see the licentious exchange go down, as it were.
And before you judge, keep in mind many on the guest list of that party have done much worse things to get what they wanted.
Weird, this kinda makes us like CSC even more? Can't say why, exactly.
Maybe it's because Carmelita actually still sleeps with this guy semi on the reg (when she's not dating someone else famous to keep her in the spotlight), so why not get a good pair of heels out of it?
And It Ain't: Kelli Bensimon, Patti Stanger, Lo Bosworth

Top suspect: Kim Kardashian (other guesses include Audrina Patridge, Lauren Conrad, Whitney Port)

Please refer to our label below for a link to the new Carmelita BV from August 2011.


Update 10/29/11 - Ted has eliminated Kelli Bensimon, Patti Stanger, Lo Bosworth, Sofia Vergara, Paula Abdul, Selena Gomez, Mila Kunis, Cameron Diaz, Lea Michele, Heather Locklear, Anne Hathaway, Jennifer Aniston, Blake Lively.

109 comments:

blurry vice said...

Lauren Conrad or Audrina Patridge?

Anonymous said...

It has got to be Audrina after the dancing comment that was thrown in there since we was just on Dancing with the stars.

jade_d said...

I immediately thought of Juliana Hough. Or is that too obvious?

Anonymous said...

I immediately thought of Kim K. while reading this. I don't see her name in the list of reveals, etc. and I know that I have read comments before stating that Ted loves the Kardashians and, therefore, probably wouldn't do blinds featuring them. Then again, that sentiment would fit this blind as he clearly likes Carmelita a ton!

Jessica said...

Two of the AIA's are from Bravo shows...maybe Kim Zolciak?

Gretchen said...

yes, please tell me why this isn't kim k.

i don't love any of the ppl mentioned, but if i had to, i guess i'd choose kim K to love over aurdina and lauren condrad!

Anonymous said...

Out of the ones suggested, I'm on board for Kim Kardashian: Ted likes the Kardashians ("très likable"); she's maybe the most famous of the reality starlets (won America over); dating various famous (sports) men. "Never been strapped for cash" - that applies, and also eliminates many suspects (though not the Hills folk). Been around for many years, check.

Also the Spanish "Carmelita" and Italian "Salami" make me think of someone with a spicy exotic name (and perhaps features?), such as Kardashian (were they of Armenian origin?).

Anonymous said...

My first thought was Kim K. also. Ted always talks about how much he loves her. And don't judge me for this, but I've watched the show and she has referred to the male part as a "salami" on multiple occasions.

Kristen said...

My first thought reading this was, "Are there any incredibly likable reality stars who have won America over?" Honest to God, I can't think of any that I would classify that way. But if she's also on E!, he might have to say that about her so as no to piss off his bosses. So it could be a Kardashian for that reason. But the "dancing" clue makes me think it was someone who was on "Dancing with the Stars", like Audrina or Julianne Hough.

Ahem said...

Kim K was on dwts... briefly but was definitely on it.

Unknown said...

Okay, I don't think this is Juliana Hough since she's not really a reality starlet...she's a professional dancer that is working on a dance show. The reality starlets would be the "stars" (term used VERY loosely) on DWTS, not the staff.

I also nix the Lauren Conrad guess since she seems quite prissy and not the type to do this. Also she has/had a fashion line and I would think would rather trade fashion credits than sex credits (i.e. I don't think she would need to do this).

I also dislike the Audrina Patridge guess b/c (a) too obvious a tie-in with DWTS and (b) she was MORTIFIED when her mama was caught by TMZ drunk and potty-mouthed defending her daughter. So...Audrina seems to be the type that would never do that sort of thing in public while others watched (same with Lauren Conrad).

I can get behind the Kim K. guess. B/c

(a) Kim K. was on DWTS and left early...i.e. she "danced out of the spotlight" on DWTS "early" but "it doesn't look like she'll be dancing out of the spotlight anytime soon".

(b) Kim K. is a TOTAL fame whore...not a lot of places this gal won't go...didn't she let a dude pee on her and realease a sex tape? I mean, everyone has ALREADY seen this chick have sex on camera....so she must have really got off on giving a "live" performance.

(c) Kim K. hung out with Paris Herpes and her crowd...and that is DEFINITELY the type of crowd that have done much worse things to get what they wanted.

So, yeah...my guess is for Kim K.

Unknown said...

Addendum/clarification: What I meant to say was Kim K. may have danced out of DWTS early but "it doesn't look like she'll be dancing out of the spotlight anytime soon".

And, even though Kim K. may be on the outs with Herpes Hilton, I'm sure she still hangs with the same nasty crowd that have done much worse.

And Kim K. is a likeable slut. I can see her seeing her public coital session as "art". LOL.

Unknown said...

@Stephanie: But is she likeable though?

Ahem said...

also. carmel-ita= skin tone of kim k is caramel...salami climber, fame from sex tape. and it's about someone exotic.

Anonymous said...

To continue with my case for Kim K - I accidentally also came accross this piece (the one from Aug 10, '10):
http://www.celebitchy.com/category/cristiano_ronaldo/

...so if Carmelita was Kim K, could the celeb X be Cristiano Ronaldo? As a sports star he must have bunches of endorsement deals (are Armani shoes coveted? I'm a fashion moron...). And of course, "Salami-climber" could refer to Ronaldo - and his, erm, salami - being of a Southern European heritage...

Also, looking at the picture of her on that page too - massive eyelashes! (Ted: "batting those pretty eyelashes of hers")

Anonymous said...

@000m and Ahem... I totally agree with your "exotic" comments and that's probably why I zeroed (no pun intended!) in on Kim too.

@Stephanie... I can definitely see Kristin Cavallari doing something like this, however, I completely agree with "I" that she is far from being a likeable figure.

The likeable slut comment regarding Kim is hysterical (and dead on)!

blurry vice said...

I like the Kim Kardashian guess. Ted loves the Kardashians!

Kristen said...

I totally didn't realize that Kim was on "Dancing with the Stars". My bad. So more points in her favor. LOL.

Anonymous said...

This seems like Kim Kardashian, but I am still doubting that Ted would post something bad about an E! celeb. The clues are all there though so its hard to argue against her. The shoes in question could be the Louis Vuitton "Beauty" pump and the dark and handsome endorser would be Kanye West. They were spotted out in NYC together awhile back and looked pretty cozy.

I'd also like to throw Holly Madison out there for consideration. She is another DWTS alum and has money from her Girls Next Door show. Wouldn't be surprised to see her screw her way to top considering that's exactly what she did with Hef.

Anonymous said...

Oops forgot to mention that Kanye West has collaborated with Louis Vuitton and created a collection called "Kanye West X Louis Vuitton". Ted calls the guy Celeb X.

Jolene Jolene said...

Hmm that's funny. I said the LV Beauty pumps about 6 hours ago on the E! boards. Coincidence?

Anonymous said...

Jamee-

I may be totally reading this wrong, but it seems like you're implying that LMS stole your idea. It very well could just be a coincidence that they made a similar suggestion to the one you made on the E! Boards. At least I myself have stopped even reading what people write on there because the top guesses are always twilight-related or someone we already know has a BV. I only look at the comments on this site.

Besides, great minds think alike!

Anonymous said...

My vote goes to Kim. Ted loves the Kardashians! Another hint I picked up on was "She's très likable." Très in French obviously means very but in Spanish tres means three. There are THREE Kardashian sisters... anyone agree?!

Jolene Jolene said...

Cathy--Quick to defend! I was just making an observation. Saying Kim K is nothing new. Throwing down the LV Beauty pumps really surprised me. But we're on the same team here, so no need to further divulge.

Stephanie--Do we live in the same Chicago?! I haven't heard one nice thing about Cavallari when she's in town. I've seen her at Hub51 and from what I know people want her to GO AWAY. Bitch needs to step off. But hey, the Bears are doing okay and they're still dating, so who am I to judge? A laid quarterback is a happy quarterback, right? Go Bears...

Anonymous said...

Regardless of who originally thought of it, I think the Kanye West tie-in is brilliant! I can totally see that dirtbag trading shoes for sex.

Have to wonder about Ted's taste if he refers to Kanye as "dark and handsome," though. ; )

Unknown said...

I just googled the LV Beauty pumps. I find them ugly. Nobody cares, I know.

Perhaps it's Chris Ronaldo who is dark and handsome and Kim lusted after a pair of Nike's?

Kristen said...

"I just can't see her ******* someone for shoes when she is an admitted shop-a-holic."

If she is a a shopaholic, wouldn't that be more reason for her to do that? And I know she loves shoes because she runs that online shoe club, ShoeDazzle.

PrincessTiff said...

There are definitely good arguments for Kim and there is the obvious Kanye connection. However, I'm still leaning towards Audrina. I think she won over America more than Kim did, referring to her stint on dancing (people were shocked when she was voted off). Also, although Kim does date famous guys, she would still be in the spotlight even if she didn't. Whereas Audrina is more of the tyupe to date someone famous to stay relevent. Lastly, I agree that it's not likely Ted would post a blind about the Kardashians because of E

Snickers Mom said...

@Kristen and @Stephanie: The blind says there was a waiting list for the shoes, not that the person couldn't afford the shoes. So, if she really wanted the shoes and didn't want to wait, I can see it.

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Kristen said...

Since I've seen this question in a few other threads, I think that we should try to find out if Ted is allowed to do Blind Vices on E! employees. I don't know if Ted would answer that question, though. Because I was looking through the list of Ted's BV reveals, and the Kardashians, Ryan Seacrest, and Chelsea Handler are all specifically listed as having never been BVs as recently as November. I find it hard to believe that none of them have done anything scandalous enough to warrant one. I mean, Taylor Swift got multiple entries, and hers are practically snooze-worthy.

However, if Ted were allowed to use a fellow E! employee as a BV subject, I think that this is exactly how he would do it: talk about how much he likes said subject and how America loves them, blah blah blah.

Anonymous said...

I hate to admit this, but I watched The Hills way too often and I just can't see Audrina getting busy in a shower with an audience. In addition, she never seemed to be as into the fashion and designer labels as the other girls on the show, IMO.

My ramblings on that aside, I'm just not convinced that Audrina has "won America over" to the same extent that Kim and the other Kardashians have. Yes, people were upset when Audrina was eliminated early from DWTS, but I think there was more outrage over the fact that Bristol outlasted Brandy.

And, really, when was the last time you read an article about Audrina? While, on the other end of the spectrum, we seem to get an update every time Kim sneezes.

Finally, unless I'm really out of the loop (totally possible), I can't think of a relationship that garnered Audrina more fame or attention. There was the extremely short-lived, maybe-relationship with Chris Pine, but were there any others?

Sorry to be so long winded and hello to everyone!! I'm pretty new to commenting, but I've been lurking for awhile trying to catch up on old blinds and reveals so I don't sound like a complete moron when I put my two cents in. : )

Elle said...

@Kristen from 11/8/10 in a BB Ted was asked about E! Stars and BVs and he said that one did have one "Yes, but probably not who you think" Kim is totally a possiblity in my mind.

Tara said...

Jamee, good call on the LV Beauty pumps, I saw your info with Gabriel Aubry on the E boards. Nailed it! I like that too, except like you said, he is not dark (but he IS handsome!). I have to admit, sometimes when I am working on a theory, I will sometimes google or see what others are saying and use that to fuel my sleuthing:) But I know you didn't mean anything by your statement.

LMS, I like the addition of Kanye to the LV theory. He is dark and handsome, I can totally see him saying that, and Kim would be the ultimate conquest for him. It is kind of hard to picture her having public sex, but not him. Guess it depends on how much she has had to drank. You have me convinced right now that he is Celeb X, regardless of who the skank is.

Ted does imply that the reality chick is not A-List. I think Kim is one of the hottest celebs out there right now, and a paparazzi magnet. Women are envious and she is not a stick, so it makes her more likeable (however slutty she may be). I can't stand Audrina. She is so vapid. She has dated Ryan Cabrera and screwed Brody too, so I wouldn't put this past her but I am still open to other ideas. Research time!

Tara said...

Elle I think he means himself (Pete Priss Ass). And he has as recently as before Christmas denied the Kardashian BV. But so many people ask, maybe he dug something up.

Elle said...

@Tara: OMG, duh, I totally forgot about that one, good point! I kind of treat the Pete Priss Ass thing as a "special" BV name though, especially since he already revealed it was him, but then used it again recently in the Bertha Rose BV. I guess when he said we'd be "suprised" who it was I just jumped to the conclusion it was someone else since he outed himself already. Who knows with Ted though, it could go either way!

Jolene Jolene said...

Ha, Tara, I love you. You're spot on, I really didn't mean anything by the LV Beauty pumps comment. I know I can be snarky sometimes, but I really just don't have the patience anymore to defend everything I say. I can only say "I didn't mean anything by it!" so many times. Oh well! Moving on...:)

To further support my Kim K. guess, here goes:

To Harper, Boston: Do you really think Kim K. is prissy? Really! If she only made a sex tape with her boyfriend and that was all, then no, that really wouldn't be a big deal. But, 1. She made a sex tape; 2. She made a sex tape in which she let her boyfriend give her a golden shower; and 3. She made a sex tape in which she let her boyfriend give her a golden shower that she released HERSELF! There's document proof that she did that. If you consider that prissy, then you and I have a veryyy different definition of the word.

And then calling her "PR savvy." I believe prissy and PR savvy for Kim go hand in hand. That's exactly what she and her equally famewhorish mother want you to think! The way she talks (her voice--ugh!), the way she acts, and the stupid sh-t that comes out of her mouth on her show make her SEEM prissy, but she's no innocent. Trustness. A girl who is not above making a sex tape and releasing it herself for the money/fame is NOT above boinking a celeb in a shower at a party for ungettable shoes/more fame.

With that being said, you better believe Kim is trying to f-ck her way to the top. It's no secret that she's trying to date/be linked with anybody who will make her more famous. Because in the end, do you really think anybody A-list even thinks about her? She's a famewhore reality TV star who does nothing. To us she's famous, but to anybody who really matters in H-wood, she's an afterthought. And she may get free loot from lines like Marchesa and William Rast, but for such a high-end line like Louis Vuitton (with a creative director like, ahem, THE Marc Jacobs)?! The LV Beauty pumps were written up by many blogs and fashion writers as some of the most-hard-to-gets of Fall '10 with some of the longest wait lists. And LV is giving their most coveted things to the Anne Hathaways/Michelle Williams/Carey Mulligans/Blake Livelys of the world. So even though Kim K can afford them, she can't go into the boutique and charge them on her AMEX. So maybe she got them from Kanye (LMS called that one!)? Or maybe she didn't. Who knows. Either way, Kanye is a HUGE step up for her on the fame ladder. He may be a d-ckhead skeeze, but he's a Grammy-winning, crazy influential musician d-ckhead skeeze. Like, friends with Jay-Z and Beyonce kind of skeeze. He has CRED. Kim K does NOT. She gets written up in the rags, but for what? Who she f-cks/is trying to f-ck, answering a question about if her chubby sister is in fact pregnant, and some of the stupid sh-t products she and her sisters are trying to hawk--a diet pill, a bikini, and an autobiography in which they spell "Confidential" with a goddamn K!! Ahhhh!! NO CRED!!!!!

And if Ted were to write a blind about an E! personality, he would write it just like this. In the end, this really isn't that scandalous. I don't think he would ever out Seacrest (if he is in fact gay), even it was veiled with a blind. But this, I mean whatever.

And there it is. Disagree away, folks! I'mma fight this one to the death!

Unknown said...

One thing is for sure, this is NOT Audrina. She may have hooked up with some skeezy guys in her past, but she literally does not care about fashion. It was essentially completely clear in The Hills that out of all those girls she cared the least about clothes, and she usually just wore a tank top, ripped jeans and flip-flops. Not to mention that she did not strike me as a sexually charged character...hell, even Lauren came off more sexual than Audrina.

Plus I agree that The Hills girls were all too prissy for something like that. Lauren, Audrina, Lo and Whitney would never even entertain the idea. Kristin might joke about it but wouldn't do it. I don't even think Heidi would do it...she preferred her famewhore crazy on the sickeningly sweet and schmaltzy side (Easter photos, beach side music videos), not the slutty (minus the H cups, of course).

This totally screams Kim K to me. I'm sorry, but prissy? Like others have said, she leaked her own sex tape where she got a golden shower! Not to mention I saw an episode of Cribs once where she had a legit stripper pole installed in her bedroom. Homegirl is not prissy.

Kanye also makes sense because I feel like I've seen some gossip linking them as a potential couple. Ted does mention that the two are still close.

Last but not least, I think everybody's main and only objection is that Ted wouldn't write a Kim blind. This blind is so over-the-top in favor of the celebrity even though this is just as slutty and ridiculous as previous blinds. He clearly loves this celeb and wants us to love her too. I have never seen such a favorable BV and thus would have no problem thinking that this is Kim.

Anonymous said...

Audrina and everyone else mentioned does not even come close on the fame radar next to Kim K, it's totes her! Everything matches! Audrina is already Z list, so can't be her and Lauren C, etc. aren't even dating celebs.

talia said...

i go with kim k as well.
because of everything you all just said.
and i don't think it was just because of the shoes she did it... i think she would have had sex with him nevertheless... why not?
;P

blurry vice said...

Yes - Ted did do a BV about an E employee. See the label for Traceless Turncoat. Top suspect for that is Guiliana DiPandi Rancic. I think the person who we all thought WAS a BV from E was Ryan Seacrest, but then he told us that no, Ryan is not a BV.

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

To Harper, Boston:

Not saying that I disagree with all of your reasoning, but from your post I think we read a couple details in the original blind differently.

I don't think Ted was saying that she couldn't get the shoes because she was strapped for cash...more like this was such a limited edition item that even celebs weren't getting freebies. For example, the Hermes Birkin bag is not gifted to anybody (even if it's Oprah or the Queen of England or whatever). Some special heels from companies like Louis Vuitton work like this as well. So whoever this BV is, it's not that she couldn't afford it, but rather that this particular item was in such high demand that even A-List celebrities weren't able to get a hold of them.

Also, although Kim K probably has many major designers giving her freebies, I think the true "top tier" fashion houses would hesitate to give Kim the most coveted freebies. She probably gets free bags here and there, but not the real good stuff. To those labels, somebody like Kim just isn't the "right kind" of famous and isn't fashionable enough. They prefer somebody edgier (Rihanna, Mischa Barton in her heyday) or more classically elegant (a Hathaway or a Theron). Kim is just a label whore, and she has expensive clothing but probably gets more freebies from a Louboutin type label than a Chanel.

Kimstyle said...

I agree with everything Jamee said!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Unknown said...

@Anna: Agree with what you said. And want to add that Kim K is seen as super slutty and cheap and, dare I say, a bit ghetto?

I just can't see that type of person as someone the high end fashion lines would court.

Honestly, y'all say Kim K's clothes are expensive but they look super low end to me (maybe b/c she wears them way too tight and bulges out of them). I think she looks cheap and tawdry and if I saw her carrying a bag or wearing certain shoes, that would be all the more reason for me NOT to get them.

Caz1310 said...

Thankyou Jamee and others in restoring my faith in the public's perceptions of Kim Kartrashian. Agree with all others who think Ted's at last done a BV on her. The only thing that sticks in my craw about this is that if her and Kanye (I'ma gonna let you have a turn now Taylor) did do this in public is why we haven't heard about it till now? I love The Hills and don't think Audrina would do this, as others have already noted. Ryan wouldn't let Ted publish a BV of this nature on Julianne so it's not her either. Have just been away on holidays at the beach and have had no internet access (what the heck?). Am catching up now :)

Alejandra said...

@Caz1310 I want to have just returned from the beach! It is 0F here. *dying*

I think it is Kim. I think Ted would do a BV (especially one that is this favorable to the person) on an E! employee.

Unknown said...

Oh, and my last comment on this, whoever this was (even if it wasn't Kim), I highly doubt that the sex act was specifically for the shoes. My guess is this was somebody the girl wanted to sleep with anyways, and she was being flirtatious knowing the likely response to "What do I have to do to get them?". Sloppy flirting, but flirting none the less. She knew what she was really after.

I think Kanye makes a lot of sense for this one. Even though he is not dark skinned, plenty of people who are not African-American don't categorize "light and dark" as compulsively as people who are African-American, meaning that for Caucasian Ted "dark and handsome" still makes sense.

So I think that whoever our suspect, it really has to be somebody who'd be attracted to Kanye West's appearance, demeanor and image. Audrina seems to prefer indie/rocker types. Kim K does fit here though. Urban appeal, flashy style and, most importantly, famous and rich...this has been her MO since day one.

Tara said...

She is totally a star effer. She probably asked about the shoes knowing Keezy would proposition her. She loves the chocolate loving, that is a given. I think we need to do a little probing this week, or let other people eliminate a few obvious others for us before we go in for the kill;)

Welcome back, Caz! I am also jealous as I sit in my 35 F world. Now I thought the golden shower Ray-J video thing was a rumor? I didn't see the vid though. You guys seem like it is the real deal? So degrading. When will people who allow that realize that the pee-er thinks you are a toilet, IE worth nothing but sheeeooot! Fernando, John Mayer, and Ray J should just go live on an island together and pee on eachother while they circle-jerk. Get em outta here, they are gross!!

Unknown said...

@Tara: Who is Fernando? I'm out of the loop.

OT: I knew a girl once whose boyfriend at the time peed on her while she was in the shower. Didn't ask...just made as if to get in the shower with her in the morning and instead peed on her. She remembers it to this day and it seems to have scarred her immensely. It's sad but this girl is very slutty and thinks she is being cool and edgy in her sluttishness. I don't mean to sound like a prude, but I truly think that even though men may like sluts....they see them as sluts and don't respect them. Same applies to slutty men - I think women don't respect them. I know I don't. Standards people!!

Caz1310 said...

Marc Jacobs wouldn't devalue LV's branding by letting Kanye get Kim's hands on the shoes would he? Whilst I'm on my soapbox...it makes me laugh when PR articles are printed with Kim languishing about not being married & with kids. Considering her sexual history surely she'd be viewed as a notch on the bedpost rather than a serious matrimonial prospect? What nice man would want her as a wife and mother of his children?

Rita, Montreal said...

To all who think that Kim K. is prissy: please remember that she had started her climb to «infamousy» by hanging on to Paris Hilton, and taking a very big part of her «Pussy Patrol». That special brand of Patrol used to challenge eachother to effing the most, some had even in kitchen restaurants, in front of the staff.

The first time the public was officially introduced to Kim K. is when she was with Paris on one of the red carpets, and had introduced Kim as her «closet designer».

Yep, Kim K. started as a celebrity closet designer.

I know that Ted tries to stay clear of his colleagues' blind vices, but like someone else said on his post, everybody was trying to hook Kim K. to one of the monikors, that he has no choice but to give her one. Personally, I think he knows a lot more about Kim K. then a little public shower boogie that already a lot of people know about.

I think Kim has bigger skeletons in her closet. And Ted, trying to be loyal to his network's #1 draw, will let some stay hidden.
My 2 cents.

Unknown said...

I'm with you Rita, this BV was ass kissing in the extreme. He probably mentions three or four times how much he likes her. It took me about two sentences to guess Kim K. I'm telling you, it pays to take note of who Ted writes positively and negatively about. Huge clues for the BV's as he writes them accordingly. Sorry, but why this respect from Ted or anyone else for that matter??? This is whoring pure and simple. She is a streetwalker with money as far as I am concerned.

Jolene Jolene said...

Anna--Agreed. I'm sure this was a multi-functioning f-ck for her. She would've done it for anything, really, but mostly just to be a star effer.

Caz--I'm going to say it's doubtful that this kind of info ever made it to M. Jacobs. Their publicists/celebrity relations reps don't go to MJ for every detail. And we don't know if she ever got the shoes, anyway. I think in the end the shoes are an afterthought.

I think that Celeb X saying "f-ck me and I'll get them for you" wasn't exactly 100% seriousness. And neither was Kim's agreement to do so.

Rita, Montreal said...

wooh Hordac, down girl! I know it's cold lately in Montreal and Toronto, but this is frigid:)

Let me ask you something though: any of the reality «stars» do anything but whore around for camera time? Thought so. So in this regard, in support of his colleague, and lately, the butter that spreads E!'s bread, Kim K. is «cute» even when effing for shoes.

Weird hein? or eh? for you know, we are Canadian.

Unknown said...

I think most people in Hollywood are whores - men and women. They whore around and do tons of drugs and then (when it's time), they finally settle down and are "legitimate" "mommys"/"daddys" e.g. Nicole Richie (reality celebutard/heroin addict/slut), Michael Douglas (serious actor/alcoholic/slut), Jenna Jameson (porn star/addict/slut), Kendra Wilkinson (playboy slut), Audrina Patridge (dumb slut), Wendy Deng (husband effing slut), Camille Grammer (call girl/"dancer"), Angeloony Jolie (heroin addict/blood drinker/brother snogger) etc.

And then everyone says "oh they have 'grown up'...it's in their past...they are great parents now. But then they relapse and/or get Cancer due to HPV from all their whoring around. These people are disgusting disease spreaders. Yuck.

Caz1310 said...

The Kartrashians have no moral values. Robert K (who passed away some years ago) was the lawyer DEFENDING OJ Simpson in court. There are rumours swirling that Momma K had an affair with an employee resulting in Khloe's birth...notice she looks nothing like Kim nor Kourtney in any shape nor form? What about the Kardashian Kard debacle? I could go on for days _ this family annoys me so much. Yes there are far bigger skeletons in this family's closet than Kim having sex for shoes. That's why Ted has chosen such a tame one for BV selection, as other bloggers have already noted.

-P said...

Wow, what's with the slut-shaming? I mean, whatever happened to live and let live? So someone effed a dude for a pair of hot shoes... it's probably par for the course in her world, and no biggie. It's not like she was hurting anyone. We obviously inhabit different worlds, but is ours necessarily more righteous?

I come here & to the Awful Truth to get vicariously titillated by celebrities' wacky sex lives, not to call people names and speculate on them getting cancer from HPV -- which, for the record, can happen to anyone who's sexually active, not just "sluts." Can we be a little less mean? Poor Kim K!

Jackie said...

Gotta agree with -P. Although I rarely comment here, I'm always reading. I come here for the fun and snark, not so much the nastiness!

Unknown said...

@-P: Hey, I'm sorry if I offended you by being offended by dangerous behaviour. (BTW, no speculation involved on Douglas getting Cancer from HPV - he tested positive for it.) And that is what most likely caused his Cancer.

We are all entitled to our opinion, so let me just defend mine. Shameless whoring around is most certainly "hurting someone"...in fact, it is hurting many "someones". Casual unprotected sex is strongly implicated in the spread of HIV and what a HUGE problem that turned out to be huh? It hurt MANY "someones" including innocent children born HIV positive and those infected by tainted blood.

Now we know that casual protected sex can spread many other STIs including genital Herpes, HPV, etc. And, again, innocent people will get hurt in this just like in the HIV case. Are you REALLY suggesting this is a righteous way to live and not hurting anyone? Um, perhaps you fail to see the big picture.

Now, I too have fun guessing all this salacious stuff. But I see it as something to be ashamed of (and perhaps sued b/c of)...hence the "blind" quality of the vice. I guess what gets my goat is how this particular Blind Vice is written as a "hey no biggie" and "isn't she just a hoot?" kind of vice. Kim K is ONLY known for whoring around...that is her claim to fame. Sadly she is a role model for a bunch of little girls and women who want to be just like her. I think that's a very harmful and scary thing and that society has, sadly, not learned anything from the AIDS crisis.

So @Jaclyn: that's a lot of concern there...not nastiness.

And, yeah, Daddy K defending OJ is vomitous. However, I heard that Mama K was very upset with him for that since she was super close to Nicole Brown.

Again, sorry if I don't think whoring around is funny and cool. Now that we know a lot more about the ramifications it...I happen to think it's dangerous and hurtful.

Peace.

-P said...

@I, I think our first point of divergence is the phrase "whoring around." "Whore" is a hurtful word, and so is "slut," in my opinion.

You don't know that these people aren't having protected sex; neither do I. It is possible they're not hurting anyone, just expressing their sexuality. But I don't think I can or should convince you otherwise.

Peace back atcha.

Violet451 said...

I am on board with the Kim K. guess. Ted obviously really likes this person and is totally amused by the whole story. I get the feeling he knows this person wouldn't mind this getting out. Sounds like Kim K. to me.

But I'm wondering: what about Nicole Scherzinger for this? I really like Kim K. for this, especially after someone suggested that the guy in question might be Kanye. Seems a perfect fit. Nicole is a DWTS winner and to me fits the famous but not uber famous aspect of this blind a little better. Probably Kim K. but I'm just putting the Nicole guess out there.

MH

Jolene Jolene said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jolene Jolene said...

This conversation just got very interesting!

I'm with -P.

to "I"--If you have sex, use a condom. Or better yet, don't have sex at all. That's the only surefire way to not spread disease. Your body is the only one you can be responsible for. Everyone else can do whatever the hell they want to do, and you really shouldn't bother being so judgmental. I mean, damn. I don't condone any of this behavior, but going around calling everyone sluts and whores, including a cancer survivor (no matter how much anyone sleeps around, NO ONE deserves cancer) is to the extreme. Your numerous paragraphs above are some of the most holier-than-thou shit I've ever heard. So you don't sleep around. Other people do. What do you want a medal?

Rita, Montreal said...

Hey Michelle! Nicole is a good one too! the only thing is, with relation to the AIAs, the only reality show that I know of for Nicole would be DWTS. Also, she is engaged to be married to that Formula 1 dude. Not that THAT would ever stop anyone in Hollywood...

Violet451 said...

@Jamee: Amen, sister!

@Rita: oops, I didn't realize Nicole S was engaged. That does make her seem less likely. The only thing throwing me about Kim K. is his comment about the person wanting to go from famous to uber famous. Kim seems to be EVERYWHERE lately. She is so ridiculously famous for so little-I can't imagine her being more in my face than she already is :)But yeah, this has got to be her.

MH

Unknown said...

@Jamee: Don't recall ever suggesting that Douglas DESERVED Cancer...you suggested that. (I would never wish that on anyone.)

What I suggested is that Douglas CAUSED his own Cancer. Which he did. Most doctors would agree considering he tested positive for HIV - just ask one. Or not, I don't care.

But please, Jamee, READ before accusing someone of saying something they never said. B/c THAT is holier than thou. :)

As for a medal, thanks honey...but not whoring around like uber-slut Kim K is it's own reward. And my continued health (God-willing) is the only medal I need :) :) :)

Be well Jamee. I believe your name means "ray of sunshine" in Hebrew.

Unknown said...

oops...meant Douglas tested positive for HPV not HIV...geezus.

Jolene Jolene said...

"I"--

You have no idea what caused Michael Douglas's cancer. It is nothing but speculation. Either way, anyone who has had just ONE sexual partner in their life can contract HPV and consequently get cancer. Does that make their cancer sadder or more unfortunate because Michael Douglas has slept around and might have personally caused it? Or are you going to judge them too?

I'm so glad you feel your life is vindicated because these people, like "uber-slut" Kim K, are so much more lowly and less than you. BRAVA! You live a healthy, whore-free life. Again, do you want a FUCKING MEDAL?!

All I'm saying is that you are judgmental. I'm not a slut, but I'm also not going around and saying all these people are sluts and whores and alcoholics and STD carriers like they're such bad people, as if I live this self-righteous, perfect life. Like -P said, live and let live. The point of this site is not about judgment. It's about gossip. I think your opinions on this topic take things a lot farther than what I like this site for. Gossip.

I don't want this to get anymore personal than it already is, so I am done. THE END.

Violet451 said...

@I -not all types of HPV are sexually transmitted. And not all of them are linked to cancer either. So, unless you are holding Michael Douglas' medical records, can we just leave him out of this?? We don't know what exactly caused his cancer. There are plenty of other STDs we can talk about that might actually be relevant to this conversation. HPV is most commonly linked to cervical cancer anyway, not the throat cancer that Michael Douglas had.

Clearly, you're happy with your choices, I. And good for you-and I mean that sincerely. I just don't understand why it means taking down other women by calling them whores. If she and the guy were both willing and played it safe, who were they hurting? Not you. Not saying that means you have to like it, but still.

MH

Unknown said...

@Michelle: B/c I'm the only one to think Kim K's a whore right? Have you read the other comments on this thread? e.g. "Kartrashians have no moral values", etc (not going to read back). Yet you jump on the bandwagon with classless Jamee here? Nice.

Excuse me for inciting the wrath of the uber-eloquent Jamee who attacks me for opining about a woman who releases a sex tape of herself being peed on (while pretending to be such a good girl).

But then again, Jamee also pounces on anyone who "steals" her ideas off the E board (which is particularly pathetic).

For the record...Kim K's a whore and Jamee's a classless bully. Now I'm done. :)

Unknown said...

For God's sake, Kim K's claim to fame is releasing a sex tape of herself being peed on (while pretending to be such a good girl)!!

Singers with actual talent are struggling in Hollywood while Kim K screws her way into a music career (she just released a video). Darn right this woman (term used loosely...very loosely) is lowly & less than me. In fact, she's lower than most people...but maybe not you Jamee.

OK, now I'm really done :)

Violet451 said...

@I: I'll give you that one-you were not the only one that said that. And I thought that as soon as I posted. And that's fair. I don't claim to know where the fork in the road between Snarkville and Moral Superiority Town actually was.

Honestly, I didn't really feel compelled to even jump into this mess until Michael Douglas was brought into it.

I'm NOT a fan of the Kardashians and I don't think many of us are. I think for me, the thing that took this to another level is when it stopped being about the Kardashians and started feeling like it was about women in general. Mostly Kim Kardashian offends me for her fakeness and empty headedness not as much with her bedroom practices, although I admit, I do NOT relate.

Anonymous said...

To I-

I'm not sure where you're getting your information from, but I have not read anywhere that Michael Douglas' cancer was caused by HPV. First of all, it's widely known that he's been a lifelong smoker and THAT'S what caused his cancer. I sure don't condone smoking, but it's certainly not "slutty," even by your standards. Second, it's interesting that you claim he tested positive for HPV, when THERE IS NO MALE TEST for HPV. With those high moral standards you have, I'm sure you're one of the 1 in 4 women who doesn't get HPV in her lifetime, so congratulations. But therefore you have no reason to have any real knowledge on the subject. I, on the other hand have experienced it (and no, I am not a "slut") so I'm pretty sure my information is a little more accurate than yours.

Unknown said...

Well, I think ``I`` is taking a lot of heat for something I started. I called Kim a whore/streetwalker simply because she is trading sex for goods and also money ie sex tape. What is the difference? Sorry I offended anyone but that's my opinion. And yes, perhaps too heavy for a gossip speculation site. I do not like the fact that women are getting rich/famous because of their bodies and not talent and/or brains. Women like Kim K and what they stand for bother me to the extreme.

Alejandra said...

Doesn't gossip and judgement go hand in hand? Otherwise it wouldn't be gossip? Just saying.

Caz1310 said...

Gossip takes a lot of forms. When people put themselves in the extreme publicity spotlight in (ahem, staged) reality shows and flood gossip magazines with fake PR articles to garner public sympathy and exposure(a la Kardashians) then they put themselves out there to be judged. A lot of gossip is harmless. Some isn't. It all starts from somewhere...unless it's Perez and he just writes whatever. E is based on gossip, celebrity info, celebrity worship etc etc. If there wasn't gossip there wouldn't be E. And no Ted C. And no Awful Truth. I have a problem with women such as the Kardashians, Paris Hilton etc being held up as role models to impressionable young girls who don't know what is right/wrong. If they want to have sex for shoes that's Ok with me. It's not when they're role models. Look at the problems teens now have with normal people filming themselves in sexual situations and thinking it's OK to spread such videos & photos amongst their peers and wider - where did such behaviour start from? Paris Hilton. I would not want my daughter emulating any of these people. Ted is always going to be biased towards E's cashcows. At least Lainey doesn't take sides-she calls it how she sees it. I'm pleased that a lot of other people also call them out.

Jackie said...

Yeah, wow, if the thread wasn't full of nastiness before it sure is now. Personal attacks, really? But by all means, I, keep it up! Go ahead and get yourself banned! I've seen people removed, or at least warned, for less...but the sisters are particularly busy these days, so whatev.

Tara said...

Where have I been? That got ugly. Let's just keep it on topic so the sisters don't have to come regulate! I would hate to see anyone banned for this.

Anonymous said...

Is the "no profanity" portion of the Comment Policy section for everyone on here or are some people (*cough* Jamee) excused from following that rule?

Just curious.

Unknown said...

OK guys, back on topic! Seriously....

I wasn't sure about Kim K being this blind, however this little number Ted wrote up today may have just swayed my mind!
"If Kim was able to lock down Kanye West to help her out with her album and video we would never count this girl out to get what she wants."

Read more: http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/the_awful_truth/b221306_kim_kardashian_coming_glee_not_fast.html#ixzz1BVeuLcnw

Rita, Montreal said...

Very true Kristin. It kind of confirmed it to me too this morning. However, was it just me or he seems a bit harsher with Kim today? reporting that Glee does not consider her any kind of famous... If he was still kissing her ass, me thinks he would've said something from the start that Glee are out of their mind for she's a superstar, etc. etc.

blurry vice said...

"Dear Ted:
I've been a fan of Sofia Vergara since I was 10-years-old. She's so funny, talented and absolutely stunning! I am so happy she's finally made it in the U.S. Since, Sofia has been around in show biz for over a decade and never strapped for cash, could she possibly be Carmelita Salami-Climber?
—E

Dear Vicey Vergara:
We totally agree about how lovable and absolutely beautiful Sofia is! In fact, so much so that we aren't quite sure if she is dirty enough for our Vicey liking. She's no ho."

bepbabe86 said...

I've seen Kim K's sex tape, I do not recall her being peed on. JS. It was a sex tape with her boyfriend, things happen. Do I think that was smart? No not really. But everyone should really get over it already. Also, an Hermes Birkin bag is supposed to be for the uber-elite, and from what I hear, there's a few of them at the Kardashian/Jenner household. Designers DO want Kim wearing their clothes etc, because as much as SOME people like to consider her a trashy whore, PLENTY of people love her. And while she may go for dark men, how many have been more famous than her? None. I wouldn't be surprised if she did get it on with Kanye, but she doesn't need to do anything with any man to stay in the spotlight, she does it all on her own.

Unknown said...

Being as I was the one who initially mentioned the Birkin bag, I think you missed my point. Somebody was saying that Kim can afford anything so she wouldn't be chasing after a pair of shoes, and also that anything could be given to her for free. I mentioned that the Birkin bag is an example of an item not gifted to anybody. Anybody with the cash who is lucky enough to find one can buy it...hell, Sheree from the Real Housewives of Atlanta has one...hardly uber elite. But it is an example of an item that even celebrities would have to search hard for to find (similar to what is mentioned in the blind, which many have speculated is the Louis Vuitton Beauty pump).

In truth, do some designers give clothes to Kim K? Absolutely. She is a celebrity, and designers want to have celebrities wear their clothing. But the true top tiers of the fashion world (Louis Vuitton, Chanel, Hermes, etc) are almost assuredly not giving their best items for free to somebody like Kim K. A generic bag maybe, but not their most high fashion and limited edition items. She is the wrong kind of celebrity to receive something like that, as her style isn't edgy or glamorous or innovative or classic/elegant...it's just expensive and trendy. She is a style icon with some segments of America, but not with the global style elite and therefore she is not going to be receiving the best goodies from them.

Violet451 said...

@Anna, I totally agree with you which is why it makes so much sense for this to be Kim K. That kind of stuff is normally gifted to somebody like Angelina Jolie or in the up and coming crowd, Blake Lively, fashion's newest It Girl. Kim K. would have to do a little extra to get a coveted item like that. She definitely fits perfectly.

Anonymous said...

Interesting thread! Like another said before me, thank you for letting me know I am not f'ing crazy!!!! I cannot stand the Ks and I am not so sure they are NOT one of the signs of the Apocalypse :-). They are promoted so relentlessly, I almost lost my mind. You all restored my sanity and faith. BTW...BV screams KK.

Tara said...

Sorry @I I missed your query about Fernando--Fernando Tinkle Treat. A BV pee-er from late last year.

I am on the KK train, just need some new confirmation from Ted that she is a BV.

Also, not trying to be spammy but I am having a makeup contest on my blog if anyone is interested. If you click on my name it will tell you my site address. Has to do w/Fergie + you can win a Stila set:)

Caz1310 said...

Great blog Tara (PS love the drawing of the pig!!!) Full price makes me angry too.

Anonymous said...

@Tara...you're blog is great as are your BV research/guesses.

Tara said...

Thanks for checking it out, ladies! I am just working on spreading the word. @Dusky: I hope that's a good thing;) I appreciate the visit.

blurry vice said...

"Dear Ted:
Could the reality star whom America loves be Ms. Paula Abdul? I know she's got her own bag of crazy, but the description fits. Love ya, Teddy!
—Cathy

Dear If the Salami Fits...:
Sorry, Cath, but Paula shows all her crazy cards. Nothing to hide there! Wrong social, er, penis climber. Love ya, back!"

Anonymous said...

@Tara..,YES!! Sorry, I reread my post and it could sound a bit snarky :-(. Your guesses are well-researched and thoughtful and your blog....the best. I actually found several deals I would use and am really happy.

Tara said...

LOL Phew! I couldn't tell but was assuming you meant well:) I am glad you scored. I love saving people money! Thank you so much, I appreciate it as a brand new blogger on the scene.

Unknown said...

@Tara: I, too, love your blog but only wish you had some Canadian (Montreal) deals on it as well!

Tara said...

Thanks, @I! I will keep my eyes peeled:) I have been able to interchange some of the CAN and US Groupon deals (like American Apparel)....just a thought for online deals like that.

Anonymous said...

Just found this blog and also loving it! And soo glad people LOATHE the Kardashians as much as I do!

FYI I saw she got peed on the video, what tape did you watch? And even if she wasn't been peed on and they were doing missionary style, why sell it to the tabloids for $$$?

And please, who would want to look like her if they have class? I'm all the way from England and not only does no one know her but we don't think plastic surgery on your face with a 3 inch layer of make up and an obsession with showing your ass and assets is something to aspire to.

We like subtle style a la Jackie O, or french actresses or even some America ones who don't look crass.

Talent is also a good thing! I think people were hard on 'I', though I agree it's their choices and it's also our choice to not pay attention to her and make her even richer from our hard poor earned dollars.

Unknown said...

Dear Ted:
I just saw Lauren Conrad's Natural High PSA and I gotta say: I love her! She and Whitney Port seem like such smart, intelligent, successful chicks who I can totally look up to. However, if anyone should burst my idol bubble, I would like it to be you. So tell me: Anything I should know about these ladies?
—A

Dear Over the Hills:
Really? I'll agree that they seem down-to-earth and fairly normal compared to the real celebrities out there. Well, at least one of the females. From what I've heard, one of your idols can be a little desperate depending on the circumstances. I won't fully burst your bubble just yet, though!

Read more: http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/the_awful_truth/b224945_bitch-back_are_glee_boys_vicey_they_look.html#ixzz1DUFrs5Sx

David said...

If Ted isn't lying to us, this has to be Jennifer Aniston. He's just said that all of the Friends except Lisa Kudrow have been Vices, yet only back in January he said Aniston had never been one.

As far as I can see, Carmelita Salami-Climber is the only possible candidate in that time frame!

Unknown said...

@David, oh come on. Jen Aniston? Really? This is a woman who, when she was with Brad Pitt, fought tooth and nail not to have naked pics of her leaked to the press. Jen threatened Perez Hilton with a lawsuit (is he even still around?) if he dared leak topless pics from one of her movies. She is SO CAREFUL about her image I can't see her doing this IN PUBLIC.

I think Jen Aniston is favored for the blind about throwing away her tampon in eager anticipation of having sex with John Mayer (though why I can't imagine).

Anonymous said...

@I - that blind that you mentioned wasn't Ted's; it was Lainey's and the guy was suspected to be the guy from Cougar Town.

David said...

@I - I didn't say that she fits the clues well (she isn't a reality starlet), but unless Ted's made a mistake this is the only real candidate since the last time Ted said Jennifer had never been a BV.

KaDixonLaw said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
blurry vice said...

lauren conrad or whitney port - deperate for shoes?


"Dear Ted:
I just saw Lauren Conrad's Natural High PSA and I gotta say: I love her! She and Whitney Port seem like such smart, intelligent, successful chicks who I can totally look up to. However, if anyone should burst my idol bubble, I would like it to be you. So tell me: Anything I should know about these ladies?
—A

Dear Over the Hills:
Really? I'll agree that they seem down-to-earth and fairly normal compared to the real celebrities out there. Well, at least one of the females. From what I've heard, one of your idols can be a little desperate depending on the circumstances. I won't fully burst your bubble just yet, though!"

blurry vice said...

no answer but hinting?

"Dear Ted:
The Kardashian sisters have been famous now for awhile. Have any of them entered Blind Vice territory yet?
—kathystr

Dear Sisters with Misters:
Please, everyone knows how Vicey they are. How do you think they combined made $65 million last year? Love them, and every last piece of dirt, and yummy men, they share with us on a regular basis. Too bad they're all settling down—less sexy time to go around."

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
julie said...

Dear Ted:
I've been wondering about Carmelita Salami-Climber lately. Do you think she'll marry her latest sports hunk du jour?
—Evelyn

Dear Whomever Do You Mean?
You just think you're so smart, don't you? (You are.)

blurry vice said...

Dear Ted:
I've been wondering about Carmelita Salami-Climber lately. Do you think she'll marry her latest sports hunk du jour?
—Evelyn

Dear Whomever Do You Mean?
You just think you're so smart, don't you? (You are.)

Dear Ted:
Did you just out Carmelita Salami-Climber as Kristen Cavallari?
—Steph

Dear Keep Climbing:
Did I? Don't think so. Cav has abandoned her naughty before for the domesticated life of a football fiancé. I've heard she's been on her best behavior. At

least for now, that is.

NT said...

So funny to go back and read this one now that Kim K and Kanye West are openly dating (but have been "friends" for years).

ad