tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post970247803358512564..comments2023-11-03T11:44:05.173-04:00Comments on Blind Items Exposed: Which celeb is involved in lawsuit?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger60125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-81164332058950304102011-09-05T18:24:42.478-04:002011-09-05T18:24:42.478-04:00Jamie Foxx. Today Ted hinted that Saucy Bossy (Jam...Jamie Foxx. Today Ted hinted that Saucy Bossy (Jamie Foxx is the popular guess for this)has a nasty STD. http://au.eonline.com/news/the_awful_truth/blind_vice_chutney_jones_gets_last_laugh/261556Zarahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07130402916803567399noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-79343582986724968232011-09-04T13:50:38.234-04:002011-09-04T13:50:38.234-04:00"Dear Ted:
Was thinking today as I took my af..."Dear Ted:<br />Was thinking today as I took my afternoon siesta that perhaps Will Smith was the one being sued by the "female" a while back for the STD and that is now what is causing his marital "non"-issues…Could that be possible? Whatever happened to that story—seemed to fall off the face of the earth, which seems very <br /><br />suspect!<br />—B<br /><br />Dear Money Talks:<br />Not suspect at all, B, the STD suspect forked over some serious moolah to keep the sitch under wraps. So very Hollywood, dontcha think? That said, it wasn't <br />Big Willie. Something else is brewing between these two that has nothing to do with pesky crotch critters."blurry vicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09344701373517638456noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-37982058556081544592011-06-24T09:19:39.757-04:002011-06-24T09:19:39.757-04:00Wow, Tiger has not been doing well. He's been...Wow, Tiger has not been doing well. He's been paying women left and right in the past 2 years for their silence. But how tacky to not wear protection, even if you don't have an STD. The way he dispenses it, you would think he'd be doubling on raincoats firstly and foremostly!Ritahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00788924521123684437noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-66914461455924499572011-06-21T14:29:21.444-04:002011-06-21T14:29:21.444-04:00Lainey held a Q&A on fb today and this questio...Lainey held a Q&A on fb today and this question got asked. She said that the majority of pepople say it's Tiger woods...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-5356316964111486592011-06-08T22:41:18.096-04:002011-06-08T22:41:18.096-04:00I think there is a very good chance that this is L...I think there is a very good chance that this is Leo DiCaprio which may actually explain why he is dating Blake Lively. He may have his own scandal to hide and Blake's scandal could provide a nice cover for his own. I like Blake and Leo together although I don't think they will last. Leo is a womanizer and leopards never change their spots.Like the other poster stated it is highly unlikely that we will ever find out who this blind is.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-33696851045156504352011-05-25T10:15:52.565-04:002011-05-25T10:15:52.565-04:00Oh wait, nevermind- actually read the entire artic...Oh wait, nevermind- actually read the entire article and it says it is unrelated to this case. Sorry guys!Alejandrahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16320994450608661149noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-4313705639884418632011-05-25T10:14:29.094-04:002011-05-25T10:14:29.094-04:00MICHAEL JACKSON?!!!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tv...MICHAEL JACKSON?!!!<br /><br />http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1389378/Woman-sues-Michael-Jacksons-estate-10m-claiming-gave-herpes.htmlAlejandrahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16320994450608661149noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-62293808534065574362011-05-25T10:00:50.500-04:002011-05-25T10:00:50.500-04:00@Lele - I think that Leo is definitely a possibili...@Lele - I think that Leo is definitely a possibility for this one (he has the money, was in Vegas around the right time and his split with Bar was announced right when this lawsuit came out). But even if it is him, there's no way that Blake is the plaintiff. First of all, the document states that the plaintiff is trying to get into acting - Blake is way ahead of that. Also, if it were Blake, it would be pretty easy for Leo to call her bluff, as she obviously wouldn't want it to get out that she had herpes. While we'll probably never find out who the actor and plaintiff are (since by now I'm sure they've settled), I think it's pretty clear that the plaintiff is NOT a celebrity.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-15093711357903917972011-05-24T21:43:47.165-04:002011-05-24T21:43:47.165-04:00Anyone think this might be Blake Lively and Leonar...Anyone think this might be Blake Lively and Leonardo DiCaprio? I was confused when I first saw those photos of them together. Doesn't Leo only date supermodels? He probably sleeps with other girls but normally he seems to be very careful to avoid getting photographed. Even though Kate Winslet says he's her bestfriend, I don't see any casual photos of them hanging out. So, I wonder if he's agreed to getting photographed together to boost Blake's career. She's pretty but she's not as stunning as the models he usually dates. I thought their photos looked kind of awkward and staged. One last piece of info that supports my random theory, Ted's gossip on King Schlong was that he slept with the "L.A. party chick who has bedded...the bisexual star who gave Crescent Kumquat herpes." So maybe Leo has herpes and owes Blake some favors to keep quiet? I'd love to hear some comments on this theory. :)Lelehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12700110465447954814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-63606194044252463362011-05-24T21:40:12.088-04:002011-05-24T21:40:12.088-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Lelehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12700110465447954814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-6441039924599675902011-05-24T21:37:07.468-04:002011-05-24T21:37:07.468-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.cl0udyshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09964458564067436424noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-84563340965916872642011-05-23T19:38:16.063-04:002011-05-23T19:38:16.063-04:00@Jamee - completely disagree? are you processing t...@Jamee - completely disagree? are you processing this right? My point wasn't just about the "one" love child. And you have to open your mind to this: some women actually endure that sort of treatment, even when they're self-sufficient and safe financially. She's also not the first Kennedy woman to conduct herself through such a situation.Kirbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16663347282778808510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-69320654625359992862011-05-20T16:47:29.898-04:002011-05-20T16:47:29.898-04:00"Arnold Scwarzenegger. Somehow I don't th..."Arnold Scwarzenegger. Somehow I don't think Maria will leave him for just one love child."<br /><br />I completely disagree. Or hope. The word on the street is that there's more than one. If that's not enough to leave your philandering, sh-t of a husband...I don't know what is.Jolene Jolenehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02982980825737253810noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-20957736165185059502011-05-20T15:26:29.818-04:002011-05-20T15:26:29.818-04:00Arnold Scwarzenegger. Somehow I don't think Ma...Arnold Scwarzenegger. Somehow I don't think Maria will leave him for just one love child.Kirbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16663347282778808510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-3167045916702545062011-05-20T10:30:09.794-04:002011-05-20T10:30:09.794-04:00Simon Cowell?Simon Cowell?sarahdb1132https://www.blogger.com/profile/11524546877547276733noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-3913399434837395372011-05-20T07:13:15.490-04:002011-05-20T07:13:15.490-04:00Lol Rita, wrinkly ballsLol Rita, wrinkly ballsClancyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03739664422671964448noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-90457914813113032542011-05-19T17:32:11.417-04:002011-05-19T17:32:11.417-04:00Wow totally Arnold!
Good call those who posted tha...Wow totally Arnold!<br />Good call those who posted that guess on 5/16!!sistah2https://www.blogger.com/profile/18034977856746920616noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-23871241646353016822011-05-19T09:46:48.998-04:002011-05-19T09:46:48.998-04:00Thanks Fanta and Cathy for clearing some things up...Thanks Fanta and Cathy for clearing some things up.<br /><br />@Karen,If you re-read Caitlin's post she directly quoted from the complaint. And she, as well as others including TMZ are misquoting. It's a moot point.Cassiopeiahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06094568366988733959noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-68636001197811120792011-05-19T09:36:47.772-04:002011-05-19T09:36:47.772-04:00I did read through the entire document and would l...I did read through the entire document and would like to clarify several things:<br /><br />1. It is the PLAINTIFF who wants to begin an acting career; the defendant is already known for both TV and movies. That rules out all the athletes that people have been guessing.<br /><br />2. The document does not say that the defendant is internationally known; someone at TMZ just doesn't know how to read. In any case, if they really are worth $100 million, then they probably are internationally known anyways.<br /><br />3. While the document clearly states throughout that the defendant is male (so no, this is not Paris Hilton), it is intentionally (not internationally, hehe) vague about the gender of the plaintiff - referring to them as J. Roe (rather than John or Jane) and being called "he" at one point in the document and "her" at another. My suspicion is that if they went to such great lengths to not disclose the gender, we're probably looking at a male-on-male situation, but we can't be sure. Closet cases and hetero man whores are all fair game for this one.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-3810871695376626092011-05-18T15:23:23.618-04:002011-05-18T15:23:23.618-04:00hmmm, René is too old to even try and cheat. The d...hmmm, René is too old to even try and cheat. The dude is like 80 years old now.<br /><br />And trust me, Céline would have his balls, wrinkled and old as them may be.Ritahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00788924521123684437noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-18112336774381537272011-05-18T15:19:06.883-04:002011-05-18T15:19:06.883-04:00Celine's husband...Celine's husband...The Raving Badgerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11256279309767004989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-50581526143761308252011-05-18T10:22:26.323-04:002011-05-18T10:22:26.323-04:00@Fanta P and Denise: No offense meant here. This ...@Fanta P and Denise: No offense meant here. This is just friendly debate, as far as I'm concerned. @Denise said a couple of things in her comment on May 16, that I disagree with:<br /><br />"It is not Tiger Woods or Michael Jordan as it specifically says this is an actor."<br /><br />I don't see where the Complaint specifies that this is an actor; neither has Ted or any other source that I've heard of. Therefore, all celebrities are fair-game and so I was simply defending my Tiger Woods guess (which I now am not so sure of). In fact, @Fanta P's point about the celebrity wanting to begin an acting career is super interesting and, if true, really opens the field up, IMO. <br /><br />In the same comment, @Denise also said: <br /><br />"Also, not that it makes a huge difference, no where in the document does it say that this person is 'internationally' known...it says 'intentionally'."<br /><br />That's totally true: The Complaint does have a line that says the celebrity in question "intentionally wielded..." However, I believe the original commenter was referencing the fact that Ted, and not the Complaint, says that this is an internationally known celebrity. <br /><br />In other words, no here is an idiot or is misreading anything other than each other's comments.KaDixonLawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08712072897414817211noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-2049206716356839542011-05-18T01:44:49.599-04:002011-05-18T01:44:49.599-04:00oh btw, my guess is with arnold. when it rains, it...oh btw, my guess is with arnold. when it rains, it pours, right? lol<br /><br />my back-up guess is justin timberlake.Fanta Phttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07545791652818831882noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-40446442481214784562011-05-18T01:35:38.000-04:002011-05-18T01:35:38.000-04:00oy vey! this is one big game of "who's on...oy vey! this is one big game of "who's on first"! denise was merely clarifying that the legal document says: "an A list celebrity of substantial fame INTENTIONALLY wielded is money, influence and notoriety to attract his prey."<br /><br />somewhere along the way, a non-meticulous person read the story and misquoted it as: "an A list celebrity of substantial fame INTERNATIONALLY..." and boom, the story had legs.<br /><br />now, it does state in the legal document that the defendant is "widely known" but for the love of god, it does not say internationally known.<br /><br />also, one more tidbit the legal document revealed is that the defendant/A list celebrity wants to BEGIN an acting career. that is a crucial clue here and may help to eliminate all of the established actors being considered for the bv.Fanta Phttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07545791652818831882noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-24384144166546287322011-05-17T18:55:01.274-04:002011-05-17T18:55:01.274-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.KaDixonLawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08712072897414817211noreply@blogger.com