tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post7617785775657775124..comments2023-11-03T11:44:05.173-04:00Comments on Blind Items Exposed: Blind Vice: Harland Fuss' Triumphant Return!Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger100125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-83819390441108248902011-10-22T14:24:39.198-04:002011-10-22T14:24:39.198-04:00"Dear Ted:
What's the deal with Orlando B..."Dear Ted:<br />What's the deal with Orlando Bloom and Miranda Kerr? I saw him gushing about her and their baby on Chelsea Lately, and it got me thinking. Is their marriage <br /><br />for real?<br />—Lyn<br /><br />Dear Till Vice Do Us Part:<br />Orli's got a packed schedule these days, what with his wifey, his baby and a Vice to boot. But that doesn't mean the supermodel and her movie star hubby <br /><br />aren't keeping it real with each other. They most certainly are."blurry vicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09344701373517638456noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-68025845644939803642011-04-30T13:45:03.148-04:002011-04-30T13:45:03.148-04:00"Dear Ted:
What do you think adorable Orlando..."Dear Ted:<br />What do you think adorable Orlando Bloom enjoys most about fatherhood, taking care of his sweet son Flynn or the new size of Miranda Kerr's boobs? Love ya.<br />—co0ftroy<br /><br />Dear Love Ya Back:<br />No brainer: daddyhood.<br /><br />Dear Ted:<br />What's up with the Kerr-Bloom family? I get the impression Orlando cares much more about baby Flynn than Mir does, right or wrong? And I still feel no love <br /><br />between them—but then, why are they still together? For PR reasons? That's long gone, I guess, there's not much buzz around them. For the baby? Yeah maybe, <br /><br />but he'll grow up and maybe he wouldn't be much traumatized if his parents weren't together. Then why? I just don't get it.<br />—Nikki<br /><br />Dear Quit Contemplating:<br />They look like a happy fam for now. Orly landed one beautiful bombshell, and, of course, as a new daddy he is going be all about his new baby boy. They both <br /><br />love the tyke, no question about that, and let them live there lives sans PR speculation. Well, at least, until we have some real details!"blurry vicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09344701373517638456noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-85083776235997228942011-03-05T13:37:48.454-05:002011-03-05T13:37:48.454-05:00"Dear Ted:
Any interesting news on Harland Fu..."Dear Ted:<br />Any interesting news on Harland Fuss lately? Has he found a way to go back on his "devil-dealing scenario" (does he even want to?), or has his beard <br /><br />permanently won the battle?<br />—thepenguinofdeath<br /><br />Dear Much More to Fuss For...<br />He has bigger and more permanent things to deal with lately, especially when it comes to that beard of his. Pretty sure she'll be staying around for a while. <br /><br />It's only proper of this not-so-wild-anymore hunk to stick around longer than usual."<br /><br />- totally orlandoblurry vicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09344701373517638456noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-47783551843141476942011-01-29T00:28:27.819-05:002011-01-29T00:28:27.819-05:00"Dear Ted:
I saw a really sweet picture today..."Dear Ted:<br />I saw a really sweet picture today of Orlando Bloom and his new son. I wonder if he's ever been a Blind Vice. If so, is it a currently active Blind Vice? <br /><br />Murph and I are staying indoors today. It's in the single digits outside and extremely cold, ice and snow hurts the pads of his paws. We hope you're nice and <br /><br />warm where you are.<br />—scottiecruz<br /><br />Dear Shivering Snow Bunnies:<br />Definitely saw the pic too, and Bloom looks like a blushing daddy. We love it. He might not have always had some squeaky-clean paws (like you and your <br /><br />adorable pup), as Orlando is a Vice superstar from years back, but he seems to be shaping, as of late. Damn!"blurry vicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09344701373517638456noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-70123766238194324412010-12-18T11:05:11.077-05:002010-12-18T11:05:11.077-05:00Wow! Just read all of the comments! Spie, thanks...Wow! Just read all of the comments! Spie, thanks you for all of your hard work! I just emailed Ted about Elijah and Viggo. Here's hoping for a response!Alejandrahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16320994450608661149noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-59797506571678043252010-11-10T21:54:01.692-05:002010-11-10T21:54:01.692-05:00"Dear Ted:
Wanna help a volunteer fanatic ove..."Dear Ted:<br />Wanna help a volunteer fanatic overcome the Monday blues? Really? Thanks! Rank the following according to how emotionally close (like BFFs) the following closeted stars are to their respective current beards, from besties to enemies in it for the PR: Toothy Tile, Seymour Plow-Me-More, Harland Fuss and Jackie Bouffant. Sending some hungover kisses your way!<br />—Hannah<br /><br />Dear Rhetorical:<br />Jackie the closest, by far. Seymour a distant second, and Toothy and Harland? Don't even ask!"blurry vicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09344701373517638456noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-57738122668629921032010-10-02T14:05:12.281-04:002010-10-02T14:05:12.281-04:00"Dear Ted:
Someone beat me to it ,but I also ..."Dear Ted:<br />Someone beat me to it ,but I also do not see, baby or not, Orlando Bloom and Miranda Kerr lasting. There is no heat whatsoever coming from her. In several shots I've seen of them she doesn't seem into him as much as he is into her. He lights up when he's with her. It seems very one sided. Miranda only married him because of the baby. I can see him or her raising the poor innocent child alone. I don't like her and if she ever breaks Orlando's heart I will punch her supermodel lights out!<br />—W<br /><br />Dear Orly-Obsessed:<br />Do I smell a hint of jealousy? Who knows slash who cares if they do work out? For now they are publicizing it up and making sure we all see them together, happy or not. Her, or his, true colors will come out eventually, and when it does, maybe you'll get your chance? While the Blooms sort it out, resist letting any fists fly; you wouldn't want Victoria coming after you for ruining her secret. Oh, and please don't feel bad for that baking bun. Whatever happens with the parentals, that baby's bound to be a babe."<br /><br /><br />"Dear Ted:<br />If Orlando Bloom is a Vice, surely you must also have some dirt on Miranda Kerr, seeing as all her sweetness and light has to be an act. Also why do you think Orlando doesn't seem happy about the baby?<br />—Dawn<br /><br />Dear Who Kerrs?<br />Unless wanting to get a bit more famous is a crime, then Miranda is pretty Viced-out, as far as I'm concerned. Don't understand why you say Bloom is being a daddy downer though—did you want a People magazine spread about how excited he is?"blurry vicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09344701373517638456noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-13492070307539587932010-09-29T13:32:56.659-04:002010-09-29T13:32:56.659-04:00"Dear Ted:
I don't what it is, but someth..."Dear Ted:<br />I don't what it is, but something tells me Miranda Kerr and Orlando Bloom aren't going to last long? What's your opinion?<br />–XOXO<br /><br />Dear Hugs and Disses:<br />I get a woof of your sneaky premonition. But, hey the lingerie model was spotted smooching her hubby just earlier this month on set of his new film in Germany. That's a little more than a trek for your everyday publicity stunt—or maybe not if you think about how far Bosworth has jetted for Skarsgard. But, remember, the Vicky Secret Angel's got a blooming bun in the oven, so it seems these three musketeers are in it for as long as they can haul it, but that's not saying a lot, is it? Jennifer Garner and Ben Affleck are still together, aren't they?"blurry vicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09344701373517638456noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-8484945305451412902010-09-21T17:05:08.091-04:002010-09-21T17:05:08.091-04:00Michelle: There's one thing that I can point ...Michelle: There's one thing that I can point to that may imply "favorite" status for Gussie and Fussy. In an early Toothy blind, when Ted wanted to use an example of another closet-case blind, he chose Gussie and Fussy.<br /><br />But you're right. At this point, it's either a mistake or Chet Chick-Muncher.The Spiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03291840630813176322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-16091676929011236822010-09-21T15:49:31.052-04:002010-09-21T15:49:31.052-04:00Looks like pretty much everything that can be said...Looks like pretty much everything that can be said about the Viggo debate has been said, I 'll throw in my two cents anyway. <br /><br />I agree that the only blind in the time frame we're working with that fits (the "no mistake" time frame, that is) is CCM. <br /><br />There are two things that make me not so sure about it and leaving the possibility of Ted making a mistake open. As others have said, I've never heard much in the way of public scandal about Viggo. It's this combined with Ted's comment about Viggo's BV being a "favorite". Is the Harland Fuss blind considered a favorite..? I was deeply into the AT around Toothy's big hayday and dropped out for a few years-just getting back into the swing of things, so I don't remember if people really were into the Harland BV, but if so, could Ted have been referring to that? GG does not have a solo blind, does he? <br /><br />In any case, I think we are left with a little doubt unless Ted gives us some info. I tend to think he is VERY careful, but mistakes could happen. I like Elijah for GG too, and "grimy" could be perhaps referring to bare hobbit feet? :) (Gotta admit most of the time I ignore the names altogether, and only use the AIA's for elimination purposes!)I think Ted just uses them to confound us!Violet451https://www.blogger.com/profile/06180436038739711922noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-67141177697095754192010-09-16T05:34:21.017-04:002010-09-16T05:34:21.017-04:00Gee what a Viggo-rous debate this has turned out t...Gee what a Viggo-rous debate this has turned out to be :)Caz1310https://www.blogger.com/profile/04847048233805428952noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-6628584534188723752010-09-15T12:56:52.249-04:002010-09-15T12:56:52.249-04:00It got a little heated over there for a minute; yo...It got a little heated over there for a minute; you just have a way with logic to settle a debate, it could've helped diffuse the argument:) I agree with LF as MVD, though some aren't buying it. There are so few celebs in the tabloids within the past 6 months with blood relatives who have a sexual scandal(Fishburne and Warren Beatty are the only two I can find), it is hard to entertain any others.Tarahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05224425644598796254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-38065280607820778022010-09-15T10:52:10.091-04:002010-09-15T10:52:10.091-04:00Tara: I've been following the Mooney thread, ...Tara: I've been following the Mooney thread, and I'm afraid that I've come to the conclusion that it's Fishburne, so I've got nothing to contribute. Remember how Ted times his blinds to coincide with bits of news. There's always a slight delay involved, between two and six weeks, which fits perfectly with the Mooney blind. It also fits perfectly with the return of Harland as well.The Spiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03291840630813176322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-79769962975342420112010-09-14T23:54:04.784-04:002010-09-14T23:54:04.784-04:00We could use a little of your scientific methodolo...We could use a little of your scientific methodology over in the Mooney Van Dangle thread, Spie. Come on over please:)Tarahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05224425644598796254noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-66994186077236089022010-09-11T13:45:04.238-04:002010-09-11T13:45:04.238-04:00Mystic: What would be news in the Chet blind is t...Mystic: What would be news in the Chet blind is the threatened release of the sex tape, not necessarily the activities that took place on the tape. The threatened release of the tape was almost certainly a recent event.<br /><br />The "Vice" in this instance is the act on the tape, not the threatened release of the tape. That could have easily taken place long before the activities of Buddy and Buck.<br /><br />And I won't agree to disagree, because, quite frankly, I'm using the Scientific Method to solve this item, while you're relying on fourth-person anecdotes.The Spiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03291840630813176322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-69192001199729086702010-09-10T22:14:09.744-04:002010-09-10T22:14:09.744-04:00The Spie- But doesn't Ted mostly write about t...The Spie- But doesn't Ted mostly write about things that happen pretty recent. At least withing a month of it happening. So if Viggo's Vice happened long before Buddy and Buck then he wrote it when it happen.<br /><br />Oh whatever. Lets agree to disagree.MysticLadyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07397695836814053551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-16055644099628525792010-09-10T21:29:50.842-04:002010-09-10T21:29:50.842-04:00And, oh, yeah, I don't care one bit about Vigg...And, oh, yeah, I don't care one bit about Viggo. I really don't care one bit about celebrities. I'm in this for the fun of solving blind items. The only thing connected with celebrities that I have an emotional opinion on is Scientology.<br /><br />So, there's no alternate agenda here to look for in regard to me. Why don't you try to disprove my thesis, by using something other than anecdotal knowledge?The Spiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03291840630813176322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-30148802606441422452010-09-10T21:26:04.784-04:002010-09-10T21:26:04.784-04:00No, Ted has not said that Viggo's BV came out ...No, Ted has <i>not</i> said that Viggo's BV came out long before Buck and Buddy. What he said is that his BV <i>happened</i> long before Buck and Buddy. Re-read the statements again. That's a very important distinction.<br /><br />And you don't get it, do you, Mystic? I don't <i>have</i> to explain why Viggo is like Chet. Similarities are irrelevant. Only contradictions are important, and there are no contradictions to Viggo being Chet. When process of elimination leaves you with only one possible answer, it's the answer if there are no contradictions. Without that principle, logic and mathematics don't work.<br /><br />The problem here is that the answer is based on Ted not having made a mistake in September 2009. I cannot assume that he did. All I have is two definite statements from him to work from. The conclusion is only as valid as the data the conclusion is based on.The Spiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03291840630813176322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-54092928216968282052010-09-10T20:02:54.556-04:002010-09-10T20:02:54.556-04:00The Spie- I'm starting to think you just want ...The Spie- I'm starting to think you just want Viggo to be Chet because Chet is straight. You want Viggo to be into men.<br /><br />Also Ted has said that Viggo's BV came out long before Buck Me and Buddy Rib-Toast. Chet happens to fall between them so it is logical that Viggo can not be Chet. Ted may have made a mistake last September. You have not answer my questions about how Viggo is like Chet.MysticLadyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07397695836814053551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-84425067298373224312010-09-10T19:39:32.357-04:002010-09-10T19:39:32.357-04:00Mystic: No, what I've done is eliminate the B...Mystic: No, what I've done is eliminate the BVs that Viggo <i>cannot</i> be. It's a perfectly valid approach to problem-solving. As a gentleman named Holmes once said, once you have eliminated the impossible, what remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.<br /><br />This is the way that logic works, and it's worked that way since the Greeks. I don't have to prove through positive confirmation that he is Chet. I have proven through negative confirmation what he is not, and what's left out of the possibilities is Chet. There is nothing in the Chet blind that eliminates Viggo.<br /><br />Would you like me to start dishing out the symbolic logic and set theory equations?The Spiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03291840630813176322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-66366883571329125152010-09-10T19:11:24.920-04:002010-09-10T19:11:24.920-04:00@The Spie- Ok let me rephrease my question: What h...@The Spie- Ok let me rephrease my question: What has Viggo done to prove he is Chet? Like public scandals or bad reputations? All you are basing Viggo for being Chet is that it falls between the dates you have mention.MysticLadyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07397695836814053551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-84421627428961604552010-09-10T18:48:18.558-04:002010-09-10T18:48:18.558-04:00Mystic: Please read above for my elimination of s...Mystic: Please read above for my elimination of suspects for Viggo's BV. All other possible candidates have now been AIAed; only Chet Chick-Muncher remains. Of course, this was predicated on the accuracy of the statement of Viggo not being a BV on September 19th, 2009.<br /><br />Until Ted comes out and directly states that he made a mistake, in my mind, Viggo is Chet. I put more weight into an absolute statement than an assumption of error.The Spiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03291840630813176322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-87240949320406506732010-09-10T18:06:07.940-04:002010-09-10T18:06:07.940-04:00You also have to remember that Ted won't alway...You also have to remember that Ted won't always eliminate a person even if it isn't their blind. I know Ted reads the E boards and he probably has someone read BIE as well. If he knows we are thinking notting Viggo for Chet means we'll assume he's Gus, he may not eliminate him. He generally tries to keep at least one other option open. <br /><br />A perfect example is Kellan Lutz for TTT. Kellan didn't have a BV as of Sept '09 and TTT's been referred to as a female numerous times but recently Ted refused to "not" Kellan for TTT. He does it when the list of suspects is really narrowed down and he needs to try and keep a red herring alive.<br /><br />All that to say, whether or not Ted answers the Chet question means nothing. He has already told us discreetly, two different times, that he (or someone) messed up on Sept. 19th. I think we have to acquiesce that Viggo's vice is from long ago.heather_phttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11638443267062976457noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-15496294604280247592010-09-10T17:35:59.882-04:002010-09-10T17:35:59.882-04:00@ The Spie- Okay I have to ask: How exactly is Che...@ The Spie- Okay I have to ask: How exactly is Chet Viggo?<br /><br />I already asked Ted if Viggo is Chet. He has yet to answer but he doesn't always answer right away.MysticLadyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07397695836814053551noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3087979845966461587.post-62523478239241406392010-09-10T16:33:15.444-04:002010-09-10T16:33:15.444-04:00That's it. We've now officially run out o...That's it. We've now officially run out of alternatives. Viggo is either Chet Chick-Muncher or Ted made a mistake. There's no other explanations or outs here.<br /><br />Like I said in my last response, it could be that the Chet Chick-Muncher incident took place a while back and is now only coming to light. That's the only good explanation for Ted's responses.<br /><br />Time to ask directly whether or not Viggo is Chet?The Spiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03291840630813176322noreply@blogger.com